Guidelines for the Use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with Secure RTP
RFC 6562

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Wesley Eddy) Yes

(Robert Sparks) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-01 for -)
No email
send info
I agree with the Discusses raised by Peter and Stephen.

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-03 for -)
No email
send info
Well, I think this is a fine document. An extra editorial pass would help and  it would be handy for future generations if the document title mentioned "security".

Personally, I would have taken out all RFC 2119 language and made this an Informational document that gave advice for people thinking about the problem, deploying, and implementing. But I intend staying out of that debate and watching the rest of the IESG squabble.

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2011-10-30 for -)
No email
send info
  The Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 21-Oct-2011 raises a few
  comments.  Please consider them.
  
  - Section 1, paragraph 2: "...can be recognised with high accuracy..."
    That seems like a bit more than a "small amount of information"

  - Section 2, 1st paragraph: "... is already considered a hard problem"
    Who considers it?

  - Section 4, last paragraph: "It is, however, still expected..."
    Who expects it?

  - section 6: It might be worth mentioning that this entire draft is
    about security.

(Pete Resnick) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-02 for -)
No email
send info
I concur with much of the feedback provided by other IESG members.

Please clean up various infelicities in coordination with the RFC Editor team ("possible sentences are possible", "easily use the rate information to easily recognize", etc.).

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-01 for -)
No email
send info
I support Stephen's discuss.