The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
RFC 6582

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Wesley Eddy) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(David Harrington) No Objection

Comment (2011-12-13 for -)
No email
send info
I read the document. I got a bit lost in the details.
The document appears to be well-written.

in section 2,
  This document assumes that the reader is familiar with the terms
   FLIGHT SIZE (FlightSize) defined in [RFC5681].  FLIGHT SIZE is
   defined as in [RFC5681] as follows:
If you assume the reader is familiar with the FLIGHT SIZE definition, why repeat it here?
If you repeat the defintion of  flight size here, why not SMSS and CWND as well?

It would have been good to have a tsvdir review of this document.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2011-12-14)
No email
send info
Please consider the comments raised in the Gen-ART Review by
  Ben Campbell on 21-Nov-2011.  The review can be found here:

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection