The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
RFC 6582
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection
I read the document. I got a bit lost in the details. The document appears to be well-written. in section 2, This document assumes that the reader is familiar with the terms SENDER MAXIMUM SEGMENT SIZE (SMSS), CONGESTION WINDOW (cwnd), and FLIGHT SIZE (FlightSize) defined in [RFC5681]. FLIGHT SIZE is defined as in [RFC5681] as follows: If you assume the reader is familiar with the FLIGHT SIZE definition, why repeat it here? If you repeat the defintion of flight size here, why not SMSS and CWND as well? It would have been good to have a tsvdir review of this document.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Please consider the comments raised in the Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell on 21-Nov-2011. The review can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06919.html
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection