Simple Authentication Schemes for the Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) and NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) Protocols
RFC 6584

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-11-30
06 (System) Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from rmt-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pete Resnick
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for David Harrington
2012-04-14
06 (System) RFC published
2012-03-29
06 Martin Stiemerling Responsible AD changed to Martin Stiemerling from David Harrington
2012-02-07
06 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-02-06
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-02-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-06
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-06
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-06
06 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-02
06 David Harrington State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed.
2012-02-02
06 David Harrington Approval announcement text changed
2012-02-02
06 David Harrington Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-02-02
06 David Harrington Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-02
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-02-02
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2012-02-02
06 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Yes from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2012-02-02
06 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-01
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-31
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
The terms ALC and NORM need to be expanded on first use.
2012-01-31
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-30
06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Section 1.2 states:

      Key sizes of length between 1024 and 2048
      bits, inclusive, SHOULD be used.  Key ...
2012-01-30
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-25
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2012-01-18
06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
This is a placeholder discuss. The authors need to take no action at this time.
This is placed to allow the IETF LC ...
2012-01-18
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2012-01-17
06 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2012-01-16
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I've cleared my Discuss.
2012-01-16
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-11
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2012-01-11
06 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-02-02
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Approval announcement text changed
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Last Call was requested
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-11
06 David Harrington Last Call text changed
2012-01-06
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-01
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-31
06 David Harrington Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Experimental
2011-12-11
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-09
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
-06 says standards track in the doc header but the tracker still
says experimental and I don't think that change of track has ...
2011-12-09
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-12-09
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-09
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-09
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-06.txt
2011-12-05
06 David Harrington State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
author negotiating text changes with discuss holders.
2011-11-03
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-11-03
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-11-03
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-03
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I support Pete Resnick's Discuss

---

Section 1

s/transfer reliably objects/reliably transfer objects/

--

  More precisely this document details the EXT_AUTH==1 header ...
2011-11-03
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-03
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) a: r/The first scheme is based on digital signatures.
          /The first scheme is based on RSA digital ...
2011-11-02
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) s2: Don't you need to specify the requirements for key size?  You could steal the text from RFC 5751 s4.2 & s4.3 ...
2011-11-02
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-02
06 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: David Harrington.
2011-11-02
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Throughout the document, the use of "Signature Cryptographic Function"
  ought to be replaced by "One-way Hash Function" or "Message Digest
  Algorithm" ...
2011-11-02
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-01
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2011-11-01
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2011-11-01
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I'm looking forward to reading responses to the Discuss positions
posted by Pete and Stephen.
2011-11-01
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I'm asking for a clarification that should be easy to resolve.  Is the
mechanism specified in this document intended to be the only ...
2011-11-01
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-01
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-10-31
06 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
This is much more for the shepherd and AD than it is for the author:

I do not understand why this document is ...
2011-10-31
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-31
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- general: Can all the ECC work here be based on RFC 6090? That
should be the case and 6090 should be referenced. ...
2011-10-31
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
The parameterisation scheme is hard to follow or broken. It
seems to be the case that the asid specifies the selection of
scheme ...
2011-10-31
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-28
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2011-10-28
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2011-10-27
06 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to David Harrington
2011-10-27
06 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to David Harrington
2011-10-26
06 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-10-19
06 David Harrington Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-11-03
2011-10-19
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Harrington
2011-10-19
06 David Harrington Ballot has been issued
2011-10-19
06 David Harrington Created "Approve" ballot
2011-10-18
06 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-10-18
06 David Harrington Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-18
06 David Harrington Last Call was requested
2011-10-18
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-18
06 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-18
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-18
06 David Harrington State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-10-18
06 David Harrington Last Call text changed
2011-09-30
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-09-30
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-05.txt
2011-08-30
06 David Harrington State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-08-30
06 David Harrington
AD Review, updated for draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-04

s/group group/group/

in 5.3.1, in the discussion of side effects, "n_m=32" is surrounded by unusual characters.

in figure 8, HEL ...
2011-07-08
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-08
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-04.txt
2010-12-01
06 David Harrington State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
2010-12-01
06 David Harrington
AD review, part I, of draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-03

Hi,

In the abstract:
"Because ... well suited to low data sessions."
"If this approach also ... medium data ...
2010-11-24
06 David Harrington State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2010-09-22
06 Cindy Morgan
"draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-03" intended for publication
in the "Proposed Standard" category.

This writeup complies with the current publication writeup template.

  (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd ...
2010-09-22
06 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-09-22
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Brian Adamson (adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-07-01
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-03.txt
2010-04-29
06 (System) Document has expired
2009-10-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-02.txt
2009-03-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-01.txt
2008-11-03
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rmt-simple-auth-for-alc-norm-00.txt