Additional HTTP Status Codes
RFC 6585

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-12-31
04 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from mnot@pobox.com, fielding@gbiv.com, draft-nottingham-http-new-status@ietf.org, stpeter@stpeter.im to stpeter@stpeter.im
2012-04-30
04 (System) RFC published
2012-03-29
04 Barry Leiba
State Change Notice email list changed to mnot@pobox.com, fielding@gbiv.com, draft-nottingham-http-new-status@tools.ietf.org, stpeter@stpeter.im from mnot@pobox.com, fielding ...
2012-03-29
04 Barry Leiba Responsible AD changed to Barry Leiba from Peter Saint-Andre
2012-02-16
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-02-16
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-02-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-02-07
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-02-06
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-02-06
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-06
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-06
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-06
04 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-02-03
04 (System) New version available: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-04.txt
2012-02-02
04 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-02-02
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation.
2012-02-02
04 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-02
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
Robert and Adrian made already the point in the COMMENTs - if backwards compatibility is not a prblem it would be good to be ...
2012-02-02
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-01
04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-01
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-01
04 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
A total nit, should h1 match the title in s4?

Too many Requests



i.e., r/many/Many
2012-02-01
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-01
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-31
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
This Comment does not quite merit a Discuss, but I hope the authors will think about whether they can address it.

I would ...
2012-01-31
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-31
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-31
04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
It would help to call out why these codes can be deployed into the existing base without disruption (existing implementations treat unknown messages ...
2012-01-31
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-31
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-30
04 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
The term substrate protocol is not a term I have seen in the lower layers of the net. Perhaps the authors should provide ...
2012-01-30
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-29
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-29
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
You might note that the 511 code doesn't help to avoid the
problem of an intercepting proxy having to fake out the ...
2012-01-29
04 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-28
04 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Section 3:

  Responses using this status code SHOULD explain how to resubmit the
  request successfully.  For example:

The SHOULD seems ...
2012-01-28
04 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2012-01-27
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Steve Hanna
2012-01-27
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Steve Hanna
2012-01-23
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Steve Hanna.
2012-01-19
04 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-01-19
04 Peter Saint-Andre Ballot has been issued
2012-01-19
04 Peter Saint-Andre Created "Approve" ballot
2012-01-19
04 Peter Saint-Andre Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-02-02
2012-01-19
04 Peter Saint-Andre State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2012-01-13
04 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2012-01-06
04 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single
IANA action which needs to be completed.

In the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP ...
2011-12-21
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Steve Hanna
2011-12-21
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Steve Hanna
2011-12-16
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Pete McCann
2011-12-16
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Pete McCann
2011-12-16
04 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-12-16
04 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-12-15
04 Peter Saint-Andre Last Call was requested
2011-12-15
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-12-15
04 (System) Last call text was added
2011-12-15
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-12-15
04 Peter Saint-Andre State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for Writeup.
2011-12-15
04 Peter Saint-Andre
Writeup from Julian Reschke.

###

  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed ...
2011-12-14
04 Peter Saint-Andre State changed to Waiting for Writeup from AD Evaluation.
2011-12-14
04 Peter Saint-Andre Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-14
04 Peter Saint-Andre Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-05
04 Peter Saint-Andre Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre State changed to AD Evaluation from AD is watching.
2011-12-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre Setting stream while adding document to the tracker
2011-12-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre Stream changed to IETF from
2011-12-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-10-31
03 (System) New version available: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-03.txt
2011-10-18
02 (System) New version available: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02.txt
2011-08-13
01 (System) New version available: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-01.txt
2011-08-13
00 (System) New version available: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt