Experiences from an IPv6-Only Network
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes
This is a very useful and well written document. Jouni Korhonen made a number of comments and suggestions in his OPS-DIR review. None is blocking, but answering them can further improve the document and I know that the editors are already considering them. I support the comments / questions in Adrian's COMMENT.
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
Good to see stuff like this. general: - A timeline would help readers understand the level of effort, e.g. if you could give dates for when stuff happened related to a specific user's home being added, or anything else that gives the right flavour for the level of effort. - Some ascii art n/w diagrams would be nice if you've time. - Some version numbers (esp. for stuff that didn't work) would be good for someone reading tihs in a few years time or who wants to try replicate your results - It'd be good if you added your wget scripts as an appendix or put 'em at some URL (again so folks can replicate) - 3rd last para of 6.2 seems to imply that'd be useful (and that matches my own experience too) - Is the DNS64/NAT64 setup you're recommending not more "wiretap" friendly than a currently typical IPv4 or dual-stack network where DNS and NAT are less coupled? Either way, that'd be worth noting I think in section 9. specific - be good to point out that you don't in general need to add new APs (3.1, 1st para) - saying it "becomes crucial" that you can find DNS servers doesn't explain why that's harder which may be worth saying (3.2 1st para) - s/a year and half/a year and a half/ (s4, 1st para) - You mention Ercisson and Skype (negatively in the latter case) but are coy about the mobile OSes (presumably IOS and Android). I'd say do one or the other. - s/only couple of times/only a couple of times/ - 5.1 - expand RA on 1st use - s/result require/results require/ or /result requires/ in 5.4 - which year is "next year" in section 8? s/next year/YYYY/ - s/cleaned from/cleaned of/ IPv4 literals
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
Thank you for an informative and readable document. If you were to have time to provide some additional words about management (in addition to the brief paragraph in section 8) it would be enlightening. - What was the user's experience of performing manual configuration where necessary? Is it the same as for v4 or messier? - What was the user's experience of running diagnostic tools to determine configuration and connectivity problems? Are the tools up to the same standard as for v4?
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Recuse