Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6
RFC 6589

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-11-30
11 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2016-11-30
11 (System) Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-04-21
11 (System) RFC published
2012-02-28
11 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-27
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-02-27
11 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-02-27
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-27
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-27
11 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-02-27
11 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-02-27
11 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-02-27
11 Jason Livingood New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-11.txt
2012-02-23
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-10.txt
2012-02-21
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-09.txt
2012-02-16
10 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-02-16
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2012-02-16
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-02-15
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-15
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2012-02-01
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2012-02-01
10 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2012-02-01
10 Ron Bonica Last Call text changed
2012-02-01
10 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested
2012-02-01
10 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-02-01
10 Ron Bonica Telechat date has been changed to 2012-02-16 from 2012-02-02
2012-01-31
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
I'm not seeing that this revision went through IETF LC. Given the scope of the changes, laying down a record confirming IETF ...
2012-01-31
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2012-01-27
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-26
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2012-01-26
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2012-01-25
10 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-02-02
2012-01-25
10 Ron Bonica State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup.
2012-01-25
10 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from AD is watching::AD Followup.
2012-01-25
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I have cleared my Discuss. Thank for such a major edit of the document.

(FWIW I think the document should be re-reviewed in ...
2012-01-25
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-01-20
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I cleared my Discuss.

Updated on 2012/1/20.

1. (cleared)

2. Throughout section 5, "domains" are anthropomorphized to "choose to
use [whitelisting ...
2012-01-20
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-22
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt
2011-10-14
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-14
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-07.txt
2011-08-08
10 Ron Bonica State changed to AD is watching::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed.
2011-08-01
10 Ron Bonica State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-06-21
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Updated to reflect feedback on rev -06 (2011/6/21).

1. The following edited text in section 4 is intended, in part, to ...
2011-06-21
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated to reflect feedback on rev -06 (2011/6/21).

The text describing "universal deployment," specifically section 5.1,
has been edited to ...
2011-06-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-06.txt
2011-05-31
10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-05-30
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot discuss]
2011-05-30
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-05-30
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-05-30
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-05.txt
2011-05-30
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Spaces in references are odd and may break some tools. Be better
not do to that I think. Example: "[Evaluating IPv6 Adoption]"

- I ...
2011-05-30
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
My original discuss said:

"I don't think the language used to describe the "universal deployment"
option is sufficiently negative. For example, I ...
2011-05-29
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-05-29
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-04.txt
2011-05-27
10 Wesley Eddy Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: Joseph Touch.
2011-04-29
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-04-29
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-04-28
10 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I don't know what to do about this document. I'm not sure I can honestly recommend this as the IETF position ...
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I don't know what to do about this document. I'm not sure I can honestly recommend this as the IETF position ...
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-04-28
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
o  DNS whitelisting is a very different behavior from the current
      practice concerning the publishing of IPv4 address resource
  ...
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
o  DNS whitelisting is a very different behavior from the current
      practice concerning the publishing of IPv4 address resource
  ...
2011-04-28
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
In practice, DNS whitelisting generally means that a very small
  fraction of the DNS recursive resolvers on the Internet (those in the ...
2011-04-28
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-27
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-26
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
From Section 2:

  for some on the
  authorized whitelist

"for all"?  Why would just "some" on the authorized whitelist receive ...
2011-04-26
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to hear more about the reasons for including "universal
deployment" as a potential deployment scenario in this document.  Is ...
2011-04-26
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-04-26
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Spaces in references are odd and may break some tools. Be better
not do to that I think. Example: "[Evaluating IPv6 Adoption]"

- I ...
2011-04-26
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
I don't think the language used to describe the "universal deployment"
option is sufficiently negative. For example, I would like to see ...
2011-04-26
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-04-26
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
At section 8.3, it does not follow from not implementing DNS whitelisting that the internet community
will "choose to take no action ...
2011-04-26
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot discuss]
The document should state explicitly that recursive resolvers must not themselves
filter records based on the whitelist technique described here.
2011-04-26
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-04-26
10 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
section 8 is "solutions", but it's not really clear what the problem is.  Not all of the solutions seem to help ...
2011-04-26
10 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
In section 7, it seems like there should be more discussion of what happens as (working) IPv6 deployments proceed, at some point possibly ...
2011-04-26
10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-04-25
10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-25
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-24
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for a document that was both informative and easy to read.

One tiny nit:

Section 3

"someone slower than usual"

s/someone ...
2011-04-24
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-22
10 Amanda Baber IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion.
2011-04-21
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2011-04-21
10 Wesley Eddy Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Joseph Touch
2011-04-15
10 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica Last Call text changed
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-04-28 by Ron Bonica
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica [Note]: 'Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Ron Bonica
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for Writeup.
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2011-04-15
10 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2011-04-15
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-04-15
10 (System) Last call text was added
2011-04-14
10 Ron Bonica State changed to Waiting for Writeup from Publication Requested.
2011-03-01
10 Cindy Morgan
This is the document shepherd writeup for
draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 IPv6 AAAA DNS
Whitelisting Implications prepared 03/01/2011.

1.a Joel Jaeggli is the documnet shepherd ...
2011-03-01
10 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-03-01
10 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-02-23
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03.txt
2011-02-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-02.txt
2011-01-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-01.txt
2010-12-03
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-00.txt