A Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) and GSS-API Mechanism for the Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)
RFC 6595
Yes
(Stephen Farrell)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2012-02-21)
Thank you for addressing my comments. As communicated by private email, I suggest the following tweaks: Section 3.1... OLD Domain name is specified in [RFC1035]. A domain name is either a "traditional domain name" as described in [RFC1035] or an "internationalized domain name" as described in [RFC5890]. NEW A domain name is either a "traditional domain name" as described in [RFC1035] or an "internationalized domain name" as described in [RFC5890]. Section 3.2... OLD Should the client support Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987] it MUST first convert the IRI to a URI before transmitting it to the server [RFC5890]. NEW Should the client support Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) [RFC3987] it MUST first map the IRI to a URI before transmitting it to the server, as defined in Section 3.1 of [RFC3987].
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-17)
8.2. IANA OID The IANA is further requested to assign an OID for this GSS mechanism in the SMI numbers registry, with the prefix of iso.org.dod.internet.security.mechanisms (1.3.6.1.5.5) and to reference this specification in the registry. What the document is actually asking IANA is to assign a new entry in the sub-registry for SMI Security for Mechanism Codes whose prefix is iso.org.dod.internet.security.mechanisms (1.3.6.1.5.5)
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-17)
f1, s2, and f2: If you're talking about the scheme isn't it HTTPS? r/HTTPs/HTTPS s6.1: If you're referring to 4648 then you need to specify which alphabet is to be used.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()