Generic Connection Admission Control (GCAC) Algorithm Specification for IP/MPLS Networks
RFC 6601
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-19)
Unknown
Agree with Robert's points in his discuss. I also found this document in general difficult to read, and hard to convince myself that it actually works as expected.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-17)
Unknown
As with all Experimental specifications, it would be nice to define some parameters for the experiment (success criteria, guidelines for those who implement and deploy the technology, etc.).
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-05)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-18)
Unknown
1) VARk = BWMck**2/VFck could be mis-read, suggest adding parenthesis or using another couple of lines like eq(2). 2) Surely there's a DoS vector here too - couldn't someone in principle provide bad inputs so that the algorithm denies service? Not sure how best to note that, but I'd say its worth a mention in the security considerations.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-01-18)
Unknown
I concur with Robert's DISCUSS points