Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) Bootstrapping for the Integrated Scenario
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Comment (2008-02-06 for -)
The security considerations say: > > No additional security considerations are imposed by the > usage of this document. > The security considerations ought to address any concerns that need to be handled by things that are not "imposed" by this document or its normative references. Are there any here? The figures seem to have double captions.
(Cullen Jennings) No Objection
(Chris Newman) No Objection
(Tim Polk) (was Discuss, No Record, Discuss) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
The introduction says: "In the integrated scenario, the bootstrapping of the home agent information can be achieved via DHCPv6." There is no motivation or reasoning why this is a good thing and whether DHCP is really the right mechanism for this problem. Also, it is not clear from the current text whether this is the only proposed mechanism as DHCP is certainly not used everywhere, especially in the mobile scenario and in the case of ipv6 connectivity bootstrapping.