Interactions between Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6): Scenarios and Related Issues
RFC 6612

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from netlmm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-05-15
07 (System) RFC published
2010-12-08
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2010-12-07
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-12-07
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-12-07
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-12-07
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-12-07
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-12-07
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2010-12-07
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-07
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Jari Arkko
2010-12-07
07 Jari Arkko Checked and updated RFC Editor notes. There's also a bug in the tools system; it only shows -06 when the IETF servers give -07.
2010-10-28
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-07.txt
2010-10-28
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::External Party by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-28
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I found the document very difficult to read for the reasons cited in point 1 of the GENART review.

This issue needs to ...
2010-10-28
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot discuss]
2010-10-28
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Stewart Bryant
2010-10-28
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
There is one typo in the RFC Editor Note.  The change introduced by the following text is in section 3.2, not section 2. ...
2010-10-28
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-10-28
07 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
The OPS-DIR review by Jouni Korhonen raised a number of non-blocking issues, most of them of editorial nature, which should be considered if ...
2010-10-28
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-27
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-10-26
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-10-21
07 Amy Vezza Telechat date was changed to 2010-10-28 from 2010-10-21 by Amy Vezza
2010-10-21
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I found the document very difficult to read for the reasons cited in point 1 of the GENART review.

This issue needs to ...
2010-10-21
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-10-21
07 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-10-21 by Jari Arkko
2010-10-18
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ralph Droms
2010-09-07
07 Jari Arkko Waiting on Ralph and Tim to clear. Reminders sent.
2010-05-22
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Donald Eastlake.
2010-05-21
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::External Party from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-05-21
07 Jari Arkko Waiting for Tim and authors to comment on my text proposal.
2010-05-20
07 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-20
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-05-20
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-05-20
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS positions.

Some nits:

Section 3, second sentence:
OLD
                      ...
2010-05-20
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-05-20
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-05-19
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Nit, in section 3.1: s/regardless/regardless of/

Nit, in section 3.2, list item 3: s/access when/access where/
Also, can you reword "delay in the ...
2010-05-19
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have some clarifications I'd like to see in the Security Considerations section.

I don't know exactly what this text means:
  Scenarios ...
2010-05-19
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-05-19
07 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS positions.
2010-05-19
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-05-19
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Nit, in section 3.1: s/regardless/regardless of/

Nit, in section 3.2, list item 3: s/access when/access where/
Also, can you reword "delay in the ...
2010-05-19
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(1) Section 3.2, list item 4 bullet 3

s/binging/binding/

(2) The final sentence in Section 5 (Security Considerations) is considerably weaker  than the ...
2010-05-19
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
(1) The security considerations seem incomplete:

(A) there was considerably more detail in the security considerations for one of the five
IDs combined ...
2010-05-19
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-05-19
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Enrico
  Marocco on 12 May 2010.  The review can be found at:

  ...
2010-05-19
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-19
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(1) Section 3.2, list item 4 bullet 3

s/binging/binding/

(2) The final sentence in Section 5 (Security Considerations) is considerably weaker  than the ...
2010-05-18
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Jari Arkko
2010-05-18
07 Jari Arkko The draft will be sent forward to IESG telechat, even though there are
outstanding Gen-ART review comments and Last Call comments from Charles
Perkins.
2010-05-17
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-16
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-05-16
07 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-05-16
07 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-05-13
07 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

We understand this document to have NO IANA actions.
2010-05-03
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2010-05-03
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2010-05-03
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-06.txt
2010-05-03
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-05-03
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-05-01
07 Jari Arkko Expecting one more change from the authors, but have sent the document forward to IETF Last Call anyway.
2010-05-01
07 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20 by Jari Arkko
2010-05-01
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-05-01
07 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-05-01
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-05-01
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-05-01
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-04-30
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-04-30
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-05.txt
2010-04-19
07 Jari Arkko Still waiting for the authors to update the draft. Reminder sent.
2009-12-09
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2009-12-09
07 Jari Arkko
I have finally made my AD review of this document. Apologies for the delay. Overall, the document was easy to read and I had no ...
2009-08-07
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2009-06-05
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Document Shepherd is Vidya Narayanan (vidyan@qualcomm.com)' added by Amy Vezza
2009-06-05
07 Amy Vezza
Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions:

# (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document # Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2009-06-05
07 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2009-06-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-04.txt
2009-05-01
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-03.txt
2009-02-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-02.txt
2008-11-17
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-01.txt
2008-10-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netlmm-mip-interactions-00.txt