FCFS SAVI: First-Come, First-Served Source Address Validation Improvement for Locally Assigned IPv6 Addresses
RFC 6620

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
14 (System) Notify list changed from savi-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-savi-fcfs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Wesley Eddy
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Harrington
2012-08-22
14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-05-08
14 (System) RFC published
2012-03-13
14 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-03-13
14 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-03-12
14 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-03-12
14 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-03-12
14 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-03-12
14 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-03-12
14 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-03-06
14 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::External Party
2012-03-06
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I cleared my Discuss.  Thank you for addressing my Discuss points.
2012-03-06
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-06
14 Jari Arkko Sent a reminder. Waiting on Ralph to clear.
2012-02-20
14 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
I cleared. Thanks for addressing my discuss.
2012-02-20
14 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
I cleared
2012-02-20
14 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-20
14 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation::External Party from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
Waiting for David and Ralph to clear
2012-02-20
14 Jari Arkko
Ralph, David:

By my read the latest draft version(s) should address your discusses. Please see previous e-mail from Marcelo as well, it explained some ...
2012-02-18
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-14.txt
2012-02-16
14 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
All of my Discuss points have been addressed except for the
following.  Thanks for your edits to the document so far.

3 ...
2012-02-10
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-13.txt
2012-01-20
14 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
A quick read resulted in these concerns:

  - The majority of the document is about switch port mappings
    although it says ...
2012-01-20
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-20
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-12.txt
2012-01-12
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
1. Cleared

2  Cleared

3. Cleared

4. Cleared

5. Cleared
2012-01-11
14 Jari Arkko Document placed on today's informal IESG telechat to try to clear the remaining issues. Per Marcelo, the new version should address everyone's comments.
2012-01-11
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-11.txt
2012-01-10
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -10-

4) in 3.2.2, "transit traffic and the packet SHOULD be discarded" why only SHOULD? what are the valid ...
2011-12-12
14 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. What is the relationship between the contributors in section 6 and
the contents of the document and the list of authors?  ...
2011-12-12
14 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
All of my Discuss points have been addressed except for the
following.  Thanks for your edits to the document so far.

3 ...
2011-11-25
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-23
14 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-23
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
All of my discuss points are cleared, except for what was
item #19. Many thanks for being willing to handle these
points.

I ...
2011-11-23
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot discuss]
2011-11-23
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-23
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this is quite long and maybe has some controversial things, it
doesn't impact that much on details of the actual scheme ...
2011-11-21
14 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-11-21
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-10.txt
2011-06-01
14 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
Many of the discusses that have been logged I agree with.
2011-06-01
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-05-27
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
There are many points in my DISCUSS, but most are requests to tighten the RFC2119 language, or explain in the text what the ...
2011-05-26
14 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-05-26
14 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-05-26
14 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Edited to remove #2.

#1) Many of the discusses that have been logged I agree with.

#2) addressed: I've been convinced that ...
2011-05-26
14 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
A quick read resulted in these concerns:

  - The majority of the document is about switch port mappings
    although it says ...
2011-05-26
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-05-26
14 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) Many of the discusses that have been logged I agree with.

#2) Maybe this is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS (nothing for the authors to ...
2011-05-26
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-26
14 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
I support the DISCUSS positions offered by Ralph and Dan.
2011-05-26
14 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-26
14 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-26
14 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3.2.5 speaks 'the case the SAVI device is a switch that supports VLANs'but provides no reference to what IEEE ...
2011-05-26
14 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-26
14 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-25
14 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-25
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I support the discusses raised against this document.
2011-05-25
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-25
14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
There are plenty of Discuss points already raised with which I agree.

---

Section 1
"The proposed mechanism..."
It is no longer a proposal ...
2011-05-25
14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-24
14 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
Some comments that I don't think are very important and that the authors should feel free to either take or ignore:

In ...
2011-05-24
14 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
Some questions I think the authors should respond to:

I believe the RetransTimer is configurable in RFC 4861, so why is 250 ms ...
2011-05-24
14 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-24
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Section 2 title - I would prefer to strike "non-normative". I see
no reason for it and the use of this expression is turning ...
2011-05-24
14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-24
14 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
1)  in 2.3, "SAVI checks would not be fulfilled by the transit traffic" I think fulfilled might be the wrong word ...
2011-05-24
14 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
There are many points in my DISCUSS, but most are requests to tighten the RFC2119 language, or explain in the text what the ...
2011-05-24
14 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-24
14 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. What is the relationship between the contributors in section 6 and
the contents of the document and the list of authors?  ...
2011-05-24
14 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
1. The definitions of "source address validation", "address ownership"
and the concept that a " source address [...] belongs to the
originator of the packet ...
2011-05-24
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-23
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Please expand "DoS" on first use and add an informational reference to RFC 4732.
2011-05-23
14 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-23
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(1) I don't understand the sentence at the end of 2.1 " Manually
configured IPv6 addresses can be supported by FCFS SAVI ...
2011-05-23
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this is quite long and maybe has some controversial things, it
doesn't impact that much on details of the actual scheme ...
2011-05-23
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-22
14 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-05-22
14 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-05-22
14 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-05-22
14 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-05-19
14 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder.
2011-05-18
14 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-05-10
14 Amanda Baber IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA
Actions that need completion.
2011-05-07
14 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2011-05-07
14 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2011-05-04
14 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-05-04
14 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-05-04
14 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-05-26
2011-05-04
14 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-05-04
14 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-05-04
14 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-05-04
14 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-05-04
14 (System) Last call text was added
2011-05-04
14 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-04-28
14 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document
Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in
particular, does ...
2011-04-28
14 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-04-28
14 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Jean-Michel Combes (jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd' added
2011-04-27
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-09.txt
2011-04-27
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-08.txt
2011-04-13
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-07.txt
2011-04-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-06.txt
2010-10-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-05.txt
2010-07-12
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-04.txt
2010-05-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-03.txt
2010-04-29
14 (System) Document has expired
2009-10-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-02.txt
2009-03-04
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-01.txt
2009-01-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs-00.txt