Skip to main content

Simplified Multicast Forwarding
RFC 6621

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-03-01 for -13)
- In 6.1.3 and 6.2.2 it says SHA-1 is used to produce a 128 bit
value.  Which of the 160 output bits are used? (Not sure if that's
in 4302 or not - short of time, sorry:-)

- Even though you're not depending much on SHA-1 collision
resistance, if you could, using SHA-256 would be a better choice
today.

- 54 pages is a lot for something with "Simplified" in the title.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-03-19)
Thank you for addressing my concern

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -13)