Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling
RFC 6624
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
(Stewart Bryant) Yes
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
Comment (2012-01-15 for -)
Nice documemnt, well positioned as complementary to the official IETF approach. Thanks. --- "PE" first appears in Section 1.1 without expansion.
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2012-01-19 for -09)
A check that acronymns are expanded on 1st use would be good, e.g. DLCI was the one I noticed.
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Comment (2012-01-18 for -)
One non-blocking comment from the Gen-ART Review by Roni Even on 7-Sep-2011 has not been resolved. Please consider it: > > Section 4.2 refers to section 4 but I am not sure where this > mechanism in section 4 is.
(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
(Sean Turner) No Objection
Comment (2012-01-18 for -)
Where do the L2VPN TLVs go in the VPLS NLRI? Does the TLV(s) appear immediately after the VPKS NRLI when sent between the two PEs?