Skip to main content

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding
RFC 6627

Yes

(David Harrington)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

David Harrington Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-03-19)
Thank you for addressing my Discuss issues and Comments.

Note that the revised text in Section 5 (for which, thanks) is
missing blank lines between the paragraphs.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-03-01)
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 28-Feb-2012 included some
  editorial suggestions that deserve consideration

  (1) Section 3.3.3.3 says:
  >
  > ... full-functionality option in Section 3.3.2.2.
  >
  I think you meant "Section 3.3.3.2".  One other place in this
  paragraph needs this correction too.

  (2) Section 4.2 says:
  >
  > The problem with 3-in-1 encoding is that the 10-codepoint does
  > not survive decapsulation with the tunneling options in
  > Section 3.3.2.1 - 3.3.2.3.
  >
  Again, you meant 3.3.3.1 - 3.3.3.3
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (for -08)

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08)