Allocation of a Generic Associated Channel Type for ITU-T MPLS Transport Profile Operation, Maintenance, and Administration (MPLS-TP OAM)
RFC 6671

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn, draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point@ietf.org, Huub.van.Helvoort@huawei.com to Huub.van.Helvoort@huawei.com
2012-11-22
04 (System) RFC published
2012-11-21
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-11-20
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-11-20
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-11-20
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from On Hold
2012-05-16
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-05-15
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to On Hold
2012-05-15
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-05-15
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-05-15
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-05-11
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Jeffrey Hutzelman.
2012-05-11
04 Christer Holmberg Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Christer Holmberg.
2012-05-10
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2012-05-10
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-10
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-05-10
04 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
This document states that:

"A number of experts in the IETF do not consider that the development or deployment of a second protocol ...
2012-05-10
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2012-05-10
04 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
The experts believe that multiple OAM protocols for MPLS-TP is undesirable for interoperability, and I agree with that.
However, I do not think ...
2012-05-10
04 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-05-09
04 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
In the IANA considerations where the value 0x8902 is suggested, it would probably be good to note that the rationale is to be ...
2012-05-09
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-05-09
04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I agree with the experts in the IETF cited in this document and with
the conclusion reached in other documents that it would ...
2012-05-09
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-05-09
04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I don't believe what this code point represents is in the best interest of the Internet, but also don't believe further changes to ...
2012-05-09
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-05-09
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-09
04 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
As others have said, the specification of multiple OAM mechanisms for MPLS-TP does not benefit the community. However, I will not block publication ...
2012-05-09
04 Ron Bonica Ballot comment text updated for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-09
04 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
As others have said, the specification of multiple OAM mechanisms of MPLS-TP does not benefit the community. However, I will not block publication ...
2012-05-09
04 Ron Bonica Ballot comment text updated for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-08
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

(This is an agreed text between the two security ADs, in case there's a concern
its a cut'n'paste error.)

While the IETF can't ...
2012-05-08
04 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-05-08
04 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
We have a situation here where we are being asked for IETF-wide approval of a code point allocation for a protocol that we ...
2012-05-08
04 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-05-08
04 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
We have a situation here where we are being asked for IETF-wide approval of a code point allocation for a protocol that we ...
2012-05-08
04 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-05-08
04 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-05-07
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
While the IETF can't dictate the contents of G.8113.1, it appears that ITU SG15 did approve the contents of RFC 5586 and in ...
2012-05-07
04 Sean Turner Ballot comment text updated for Sean Turner
2012-05-07
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
While the IETF can't dictate the contents of G.8113.1, it appears that ITU SG15 did approve the contents of RFC 5586 and in ...
2012-05-07
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-05-07
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]

  I believe that multiple OAM protocols for MPLS-TP is undesirable;
  however, I do not think it is in the best interest ...
2012-05-07
04 Russ Housley Ballot comment text updated for Russ Housley
2012-05-07
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-07
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]

  I believe that multiple OAM protocols for MPLS-TP is undesirable;
  however, I do not think it is in the best interest ...
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley Ballot comment text updated for Russ Housley
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]

  I believe that multiple OAM protocols for MPLS-TP is undesirable. I
  do not think it is in the best interest of ...
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley Ballot comment text updated for Russ Housley
2012-05-06
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to Abstain from No Record
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]

  I believe that multiple OAM protocols for MPLS-TP is undesirable.  I do not think it is in the best
  interest of ...
2012-05-06
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-05-05
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-05
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-04
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-04
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-04
04 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
Please can you  make the following change to clarify what we want the RFC Editor to do:

OLD
[G.8113.1]  ITU-T Recommendation ''Operations, Administration ...
2012-05-04
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-05-04
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2012-05-03
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-05-03
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-05-02
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-04-29
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-05-10
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot has been issued
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel Created "Approve" ballot
2012-04-23
04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup was changed
2012-04-10
04 Malcolm Betts New version available: draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-04.txt
2012-03-26
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Point Raised - writeup needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-03-21
03 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-02-26
03 Christer Holmberg Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Christer Holmberg.
2012-02-23
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-02-23
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-02-23
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2012-02-23
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2012-02-22
03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2012-02-22
03 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2012-02-22
03 Adrian Farrel Last Call was requested
2012-02-22
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-02-22
03 Adrian Farrel Last Call text changed
2012-02-22
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2012-02-22
03 (System) Last call text was added
2012-02-22
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2012-02-22
03 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-20
03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2012-02-20
03 (System) New version available: draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt
2012-02-13
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-16
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed.
2012-01-16
02 (System) New version available: draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-02.txt
2011-12-09
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed from AD Evaluation.
2011-12-09
03 Adrian Farrel
AD review comments and questions

---

Hi Malcolm and Huub,

I have squeezed a little time from the current ITU-T meeting to look at your ...
2011-12-07
03 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-12-01
03 Amy Vezza
Document Writeup for draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-01.txt

As required by RFC-to-be draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines, this is the
current template for the Document Shepherd Write-Up for individual
submissions via the IESG. ...
2011-12-01
03 Amy Vezza Setting stream while adding document to the tracker
2011-12-01
03 Amy Vezza Stream changed to IETF from
2011-12-01
03 Amy Vezza Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-12-01
03 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Huub van Helvoort (Huub.van.Helvoort@huawei.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-11-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-01.txt
2011-10-16
00 (System) New version available: draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-00.txt