Skip to main content

EAP Extensions for the EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)
RFC 6696

Yes

(Stephen Farrell)

No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -06)

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-04-06 for -06)
I have no objection to thepublication of this document.

Please supply a short section "Changes from RFC 5296"

Pleasecheck that all Erratahave also been applied to this revision
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5296

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-05-17)
[Updated 17 May 2012, to clear my DISCUSS after the posting of -07.]

Glen,
Thanks for including my text for the IANA Considerations; I'm clearing my DISCUSS.

In section 10, I would have thought
   s/insisted/stamped his foot petulantly and insisted/
so thanks for your restraint.  In any case, I'm happy to stand behind what's in section 9.

In section 11, the backhanded compliment to your colleagues, "(mostly)", is quite unnecessary.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-04-11 for -06)
Pedantic nits:

4.1 (and similarly in 4.3 and 4.6):

   The rIK Label is the 8-bit ASCII string:

What is an "8-bit ASCII string"? Do you mean "the following string of US-ASCII characters encoded in octets" or something like that?

5.2 (also 5.3.2 and 5.3.3):

      a 16-bit sequence number

Any issue about byte order or sign/unsigned with these?

5.3.3:

         The value
         field is a 32-bit field and contains the lifetime of the [...] in
         seconds.
         
Again, any issue with byte order or sign/unsigned with these?

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-05-17)
Thank you for addressing the issues in my previous Discuss position.

Figures 9 and 10 contain minor typos, including the capitalization
of "cryptosuite" and missing " " (space characters) that affect
the alignment of the ASCII-art.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-04-10 for -06)
Nice job folks.  Only nits:

s3.2: r/5shows/5 shows
s4.1: 4th bullet r/must/MUST ?

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)