Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy
RFC 6701
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes
Not sure this worth doing but should we state that the rules also apply to remote participants in the contribution paragraph? Maybe add the following as a new second sentence: Remote participants as well as those participating in person at IETF meetings are bound by this definition. Also should we add jabber in there to the first sentence?
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes
Who's that Barry Liebe guy? Must be someone in love with Berlin:-)
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
The policies set out in [BCP79] state that each individual participant is responsible for disclosing or ensuring the disclosure of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) where: - they are aware of the IPR - the IPR is relevant to the IETF work they are participating in - the IPR is owned by the individual or by a company that employs or sponsors the individual's work. I think that you should put an "and" after each list item.
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) Recuse