Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Requirements
RFC 6708

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
16 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'Many Internet applications are used to access resources, such as pieces of information or server processes ...
2016-11-30
16 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
16 (System) Notify list changed from alto-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-alto-reqs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-09-30
16 (System) RFC published
2012-07-10
16 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-07-09
16 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-07-09
16 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-07-09
16 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-07-09
16 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-07-09
16 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-07-09
16 Wesley Eddy State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-07-09
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concern.
2012-07-09
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-22
16 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Please review Ted Hardie's comments in his Apps Directorate review <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03337.html> and address as appropriate.
2012-06-22
16 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-20
16 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-15
16 Sebastian Kiesel New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-16.txt
2012-05-29
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

I'm (still:-) a bit confused by what might be a conflict
between sections 3.3 and 5.2. The former says that
nothing is mandatory-to-use, ...
2012-05-29
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-05-29
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and Comments
2012-05-29
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-05-29
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-05-29
15 Sebastian Kiesel New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-15.txt
2012-05-10
14 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-05-10
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Thank you for explaining that other groups potentially (or even likely) *will* be using this document in the future; I think that makes ...
2012-05-10
14 Pete Resnick Ballot discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-05-10
14 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I'm throwing my lot in with Stephen and Pete.
2012-05-10
14 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-05-10
14 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
Both the document and the reviewer are confused over the transport protocol to be used.

REQ.  ARv14-12: uses TCP as an example, as ...
2012-05-10
14 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-05-10
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
1. In his Apps Directorate review <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03337.html>, Ted Hardie expressed concerns that some privacy issues are not properly addressed by this ...
2012-05-10
14 Pete Resnick Ballot discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-05-10
14 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-10
14 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-05-09
14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
1. In his Apps Directorate review <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03337.html>, Ted Hardie expressed concerns that some privacy issues are not properly addressed by this ...
2012-05-09
14 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Please review Ted's other minor comments in his Apps Directorate review <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03337.html> and address as appropriate.
2012-05-09
14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-05-09
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

I'm a bit confused by what might be a conflict
between sections 3.3 and 5.2. The former says that
nothing is mandatory-to-use, but ...
2012-05-09
14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Its surprising that most of the text in section 5 is
about protecting the operator's interests. If that's
just because the user's interests ...
2012-05-09
14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-05-09
14 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-05-09
14 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Looking at Adrian's feedback on this draft, I support his DISCUSS:
    Section 3.1 needs to discuss manageability requirements for the new ...
2012-05-09
14 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2012-05-08
14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
In general I support this document, but I have a number of points that
need to be looked at before publication. A couple ...
2012-05-08
14 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Although not part of the Discuss, I would strongly recommend that you
work through these Comments before publication.

---

I think you need ...
2012-05-08
14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-05-08
14 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-05-08
14 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Substantive suggestions; please adopt or respond to these:

- Section 1. Introduction

  Usually, it would be difficult or even impossible for application ...
2012-05-08
14 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-05-02
14 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I agree with Barry that some of the requirements should be re-worded.  Otherwise, I have no issues with publishing this document.
2012-05-02
14 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Substantive suggestions; please adopt or respond to these:

   REQ.  ARv14-9: An ALTO client protocol specification MUST define
   mechanisms, which can be ...
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba Ballot comment text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Substantive suggestions; please adopt or respond to these:

   REQ.  ARv14-9: An ALTO client protocol specification MUST define
   mechanisms, which can be ...
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba Ballot comment text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Substantive suggestions; please adopt or respond to these:

   REQ.  ARv14-9: An ALTO client protocol specification MUST define
   mechanisms, which can be ...
2012-04-28
14 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-04-24
14 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] Position for Martin Stiemerling has been changed to Recuse from Abstain
2012-04-24
14 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-05-10
2012-04-23
14 Wesley Eddy State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup
2012-04-19
14 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-04-19
14 Sebastian Kiesel New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-14.txt
2012-03-29
13 Martin Stiemerling Responsible AD changed to Wesley Eddy from David Harrington
2012-02-15
13 David Harrington
State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
I reviewed -13-
It appears to me that comments from ...
2012-01-23
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Paul Hoffman.
2012-01-16
13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2012-01-16
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-13.txt
2012-01-13
13 David Harrington
State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
Last Call comments from Ted Hardie and bert Wijnen should be ...
2012-01-12
13 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2012-01-06
13 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-12-30
13 Mary Barnes Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2011-12-30
13 Mary Barnes Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2011-12-29
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Paul Hoffman
2011-12-29
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Paul Hoffman
2011-12-23
13 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-12-23
13 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-12-23
13 David Harrington Last Call was requested
2011-12-23
13 David Harrington State changed to Last Call Requested from In Last Call.
2011-12-23
13 David Harrington Last Call text changed
2011-12-22
13 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-12-22
13 David Harrington Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-22
13 David Harrington Last Call was requested
2011-12-22
13 David Harrington State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-22
13 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-12-22
13 (System) Last call text was added
2011-12-22
13 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-12-22
13 David Harrington Last Call text changed
2011-11-14
13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-11-14
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-12.txt
2011-10-11
13 David Harrington
State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
AD Review of draft-ietf-alto-reqs

draft-ietf-alto-reqs-11

1) in abstract, s/candidates, that/candidates that/

2) in 1, the ...
2011-09-09
13 David Harrington State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-08-22
13 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does he ...
2011-08-22
13 Cindy Morgan State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching.
2011-08-22
13 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Enrico Marocco (enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-08-19
13 Vijay Gurbani Changed protocol writeup
2011-07-11
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-11.txt
2011-06-10
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-10.txt
2011-05-10
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-09.txt
2011-03-14
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-08.txt
2011-01-24
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-07.txt
2010-11-09
13 Cindy Morgan Responsible AD has been changed to David Harrington from Peter Saint-Andre
2010-10-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-06.txt
2010-07-16
13 Peter Saint-Andre Draft Added by Peter Saint-Andre in state AD is watching
2010-06-14
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-05.txt
2010-03-08
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-04.txt
2010-02-17
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-03.txt
2009-10-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-02.txt
2009-07-13
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-01.txt
2009-04-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-alto-reqs-00.txt