vCard Format Extensions: Representing vCard Extensions Defined by the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Converged Address Book (CAB) Group
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Pete Resnick) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
- The INDEX parameter in 3.1 seems different from the others. I wondered if it really caused this to update 6530, since presumably it could make sense with any multi-valued thing? I assume the argument that it doesn't is that 6530 implementations will ignore it if they don't also support this spec, and I'm ok with that, but just wanted to check. - Is LEVEL (3.2) only supposed to be used with hobby, etc.? If so, then maybe you need some 2119 language for that? If not, then maybe say that. I could imagine LEVEL being used e.g. with ROLE or TITLE or maybe even SOUND (at a stretch:-).
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
In the Gen-ART Review by Joel Halpern on 8-Jun-2012, it was pointed out that a reference two RFC 2119 is needed since there is one MUST.