The Diameter Capabilities Update Application
RFC 6737

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2019-02-11
Jenny Bui Posted related IPR disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6737
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from dime-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update@ietf.org to (None)
2012-10-26
07 (System) RFC published
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alexey Melnikov
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-05-08
07 Benoît Claise Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-08
07 Benoît Claise Ballot writeup was changed
2012-03-29
07 Benoît Claise Responsible AD changed to Benoit Claise from Dan Romascanu
2011-06-14
07 Jouni Korhonen Send to IESG a while ago.
2011-06-14
07 Jouni Korhonen IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-05-31
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-05-31
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-05-23
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2011-05-23
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-05-23
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-05-23
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-05-23
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-05-23
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-05-23
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-05-23
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-05-18
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-10
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-11-16
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 19-Oct-2010 raised a question
  that needs to be answered.

  This document requests allocation of …
2010-11-16
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-11-16
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-10-26
07 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-24
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-24
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-07.txt
2010-10-22
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-10-21
2010-10-21
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-10-21
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-21
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-10-21
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-10-21
07 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
I am agreeing with Peter's DISCUSS.

Also:

  If the receiver of a CUR does not have any applications in common
  with …
2010-10-21
07 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-10-21
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-10-20
07 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Peter's discuss.
2010-10-20
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-10-20
07 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I support Peter's discuss.
2010-10-20
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss.  To be clear, I am not asking for changes, just looking for clarification.

In section 4, it states:

  …
2010-10-20
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-10-20
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I support this work in principle, but there are a few small points to
be addressed before I can ballot No Objection.

--- …
2010-10-20
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-20
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 19-Oct-2010 raised a question
  that needs to be answered.

  This document requests allocation of …
2010-10-20
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-10-20
07 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
4.  Capabilities Update

  When the capabilities of a Diameter node conforming to this
  specification change, it MUST notify all of the …
2010-10-20
07 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
If the receiver of a CUR does not have any applications in common
  with the sender then it MUST return a Capabilities-Update-Answer …
2010-10-20
07 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-10-20
07 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Support Peter's discuss.

I also suggest being even more explicit about what an implementation should/could do if a peer tries to modify the …
2010-10-20
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-10-20
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-10-20
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-10-20
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
I support Peter's discuss.


Section 1., paragraph 3:
>    Discussion of this draft may be directed to the dime Working Group of …
2010-10-20
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-10-19
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
1. In Section 4, there is a typo: "Attibute-Value"
2010-10-19
07 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
1. Let me see if I understand this. The basic idea is that any two Diameter nodes can dynamically inform each other when …
2010-10-19
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-10-18
07 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The last paragraph of 4.0 discusses the possibility of a peer being down, and sending an UNABLE-TO-Deliver error, which can trigger rerouting …
2010-10-18
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-10-12
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
07 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
07 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2010-10-12
07 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-10-21 by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
07 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-06.txt
2010-10-10
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Dan Harkins.
2010-10-05
07 Amy Vezza State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-09-30
07 Amanda Baber
Upon approval of this document, IANA understands that there are two IANA
actions that it must complete.

First, in the Application IDs subregistry of the …
2010-09-25
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2010-09-25
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2010-09-20
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-09-20
07 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-09-20
07 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-20
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-09-20
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-09-20
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-09-20
07 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-19
07 Dan Romascanu State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Dan Romascanu
2010-07-22
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Lionel Morand (lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-07-22
07 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?

==> Lionel Morand

Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of
the
document and, in …
2010-07-22
07 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-06-18
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-05.txt
2010-05-24
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-04.txt
2010-02-26
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-03.txt
2010-02-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-02.txt
2009-12-02
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-01.txt
2009-07-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-capablities-update-00.txt