DCCP-UDP: A Datagram Congestion Control Protocol UDP Encapsulation for NAT Traversal
RFC 6773

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-12-31
11 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from dccp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap@ietf.org to (None)
2012-11-14
11 (System) RFC published
2012-09-05
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-09-04
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-08-31
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-08-31
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-08-30
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-08-23
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-08-22
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-08-22
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from None
2012-08-22
11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-08-22
11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-08-22
11 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-08-21
11 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-21
11 Wesley Eddy State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-08-08
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-12
11 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Consider pointing out in the description of the first method in section 3.8 that peers that implement
this method will not work with ...
2012-07-12
11 Robert Sparks Ballot comment text updated for Robert Sparks
2012-07-12
11 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Consider pointing out in the description of the first method in section 3.8 that peers that implement
this method will not work with ...
2012-07-12
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-05
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot comment]
All my comments have been addressed by the new revision of the draft. So, I am clearing my discuss. Thanks!
2012-07-05
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] Position for Gonzalo Camarillo has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-25
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-06-25
11 Gorry Fairhurst New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-11.txt
2012-06-19
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Tina Tsou.
2012-06-07
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-06-07
10 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot discuss]
As pointed out by Robert as well, this draft had not been reviewed by the SDP directorate. Flemming has been kind enough to ...
2012-06-07
10 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot comment]

Section 3.8, 4th paragraph:
s/a DCCP-UDP server must therefore/a DCCP-UDP MUST therefore/ ??
                    ...
2012-06-07
10 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-06
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Please consider the comments from Carsten Bormann's review:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg06038.html
2012-06-06
10 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-06-06
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-06-06
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-06-06
10 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
"These fields identify the UDP ports on which the source and
  destination (respectively) of the packet are listening for
  incoming DCCP-UDP ...
2012-06-06
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-06-06
10 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot discuss]
As pointed out by Robert as well, this draft was not reviewed by the SDP directorate. I will get the chairs of the ...
2012-06-06
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-05
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This draft says:

  DCCP-UDP provides all of the security risk-mitigation measures
  present in DCCP-STD, and also all of the security risks. ...
2012-06-05
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-06-05
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
1) The requirement to only use a single UDP port when encapsulating DCCP that would have been on two ports (separate RTP and ...
2012-06-05
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I don't think this received an SDP directorate review so far (see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/sdp.html), though I think Colin did point this document out ...
2012-06-05
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-06-05
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
My only comment is really a question: do we want to define a mechanism for working around IPv6 NAT, thereby perhaps passively encouraging ...
2012-06-05
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-06-05
10 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Substantive comments; these are non-blocking, but please consider them
seriously, and feel free to chat with me about them:

Ditto on "Update 5762", ...
2012-06-05
10 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-06-04
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- Isn't this really pretending that the need for a UDP
encapsulation is "short-term"? Why is such pretense useful?

- Along the same ...
2012-06-04
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-06-04
10 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10 and has the following comments:

IANA has a question about one of the IANA actions requested in this document.

IANA understands ...
2012-06-04
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-06-04
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Martin already found everything I found
2012-06-04
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-04
10 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-06-04
10 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
Good document with some nits:

- ID-Nits complains a bit about unused references and one obsoloted reference
  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC ...
2012-06-04
10 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-01
10 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]

  Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review by
  Kathleen Moriarty on 25-May-2012.  Please find the review here:
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg07453.html
2012-06-01
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-05-30
10 Wesley Eddy State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-05-30
10 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2012-05-30
10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-05-30
10 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-30
10 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2012-05-25
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-05-18
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2012-05-18
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2012-05-17
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2012-05-17
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2012-05-15
10 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07
2012-05-11
10 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <dccp@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10.txt> (Datagram Congestion ...
2012-05-11
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy Last call was requested
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy Last call announcement was generated
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was generated
2012-05-11
10 Wesley Eddy State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-05-04
10 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-04-26
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2012-04-26
10 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?  Why
is this the proper type of RFC?  ...
2012-04-26
10 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Pasi Sarolahti (pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi) is the document shepherd.'
2012-03-26
10 Gorry Fairhurst New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10.txt
2012-01-13
09 (System) Document has expired
2012-01-13
09 (System) State changed to Dead from AD is watching.
2011-09-16
09 Wesley Eddy Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-07-12
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-09.txt
2011-05-17
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-08.txt
2011-03-10
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-07.txt
2011-02-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-06.txt
2011-02-23
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-05.txt
2011-02-02
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-04.txt
2010-12-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-03.txt
2010-08-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-02.txt
2010-06-24
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-01.txt
2010-02-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-00.txt