Skip to main content

RSVP ASSOCIATION Object Extensions
RFC 6780

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -05)

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-09-11 for -05)
This seems like a clear document.  And thanks for a very crisp and clear IANA section.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2012-09-24)
The updates to section 5 address my Discuss.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-09-09 for -05)
  As noted in the Gen-ART Review by Peter Yee on 6-Sep-2012,
  Section 4, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: "identifies" -> "identify".

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2012-09-10 for -05)

I wish I didn't get the feeling that someone is missing
something everytime I read the security considerations section
for MPLS documents. To be honest, it all just seems like too
good a deal, basically not having to worry about bad actors.
(Note: that's a general lament/whinge, not specific to this
document. Sorry about that;-)

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -05)