RSVP ASSOCIATION Object Extensions
RFC 6780

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2012-09-24)
No email
send info
The updates to section 5 address my Discuss.

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2012-09-10 for -05)
No email
send info

I wish I didn't get the feeling that someone is missing
something everytime I read the security considerations section
for MPLS documents. To be honest, it all just seems like too
good a deal, basically not having to worry about bad actors.
(Note: that's a general lament/whinge, not specific to this
document. Sorry about that;-)

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2012-09-09 for -05)
No email
send info
  As noted in the Gen-ART Review by Peter Yee on 6-Sep-2012,
  Section 4, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: "identifies" -> "identify".

Barry Leiba No Objection

Comment (2012-09-11 for -05)
No email
send info
This seems like a clear document.  And thanks for a very crisp and clear IANA section.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection