RSVP ASSOCIATION Object Extensions
RFC 6780
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
This seems like a clear document. And thanks for a very crisp and clear IANA section.
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
The updates to section 5 address my Discuss.
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
As noted in the Gen-ART Review by Peter Yee on 6-Sep-2012, Section 4, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: "identifies" -> "identify".
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
I wish I didn't get the feeling that someone is missing something everytime I read the security considerations section for MPLS documents. To be honest, it all just seems like too good a deal, basically not having to worry about bad actors. (Note: that's a general lament/whinge, not specific to this document. Sorry about that;-)
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection