RSVP ASSOCIATION Object Extensions
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection
The updates to section 5 address my Discuss.
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2012-09-10 for -05)
I wish I didn't get the feeling that someone is missing something everytime I read the security considerations section for MPLS documents. To be honest, it all just seems like too good a deal, basically not having to worry about bad actors. (Note: that's a general lament/whinge, not specific to this document. Sorry about that;-)
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Comment (2012-09-09 for -05)
As noted in the Gen-ART Review by Peter Yee on 6-Sep-2012, Section 4, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: "identifies" -> "identify".
Barry Leiba No Objection
Comment (2012-09-11 for -05)
This seems like a clear document. And thanks for a very crisp and clear IANA section.