The Line-Identification Option
RFC 6788

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-01-03
Jasmine Magallanes Posted related IPR disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd 's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6788
2015-12-31
08 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-10-14
08 (System) Notify list changed from 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-lineid@ietf.org to (None)
2012-11-20
08 (System) RFC published
2012-09-11
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-09-11
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-09-11
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-09-07
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-09-07
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-09-06
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-09-06
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on ADs
2012-09-06
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on ADs from In Progress
2012-09-06
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-09-06
08 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-09-06
08 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-09-06
08 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-09-06
08 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-09-05
08 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-09-04
08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-08-28
08 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-6man-lineid-08 and has the following comments:

IANA has a question about the IANA actions requested in the IANA
Considerations section of this …
2012-08-21
08 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <ipv6@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-lineid-08.txt> (The Line …
2012-08-21
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to Last Call Requested from None
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Last call was requested
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Followup
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Last call announcement was generated
2012-08-21
08 Brian Haberman Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Experimental
2012-08-20
08 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-08-17
08 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-08.txt
2012-08-17
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. (cleared)

2. (cleared)

3. (cleared)

4. Two questions about this text from section 6.2:

  If the Source Address field of the …
2012-08-17
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-08-17
07 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-07.txt
2012-08-17
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated for rev -06; waiting for -07 to be available to clear point 8.

1. (cleared)

2. (cleared, but see new comment)

3. …
2012-08-17
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. (cleared)

2. (cleared)

3. (cleared)

4. Two questions about this text from section 6.2:

  If the Source Address field of the …
2012-08-17
06 Ralph Droms Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Ralph Droms
2012-08-13
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-08-13
06 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-06.txt
2012-07-05
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Dan Harkins.
2012-07-05
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated by adding point 8.

1. In section 4:

  This document recommends tunneling Neighbor discovery packets inside
  another IPv6 packet that …
2012-07-05
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. I'm curious about the use of "Ethernet" as an adjective
throughout the document.  For example, in the abstract, what does
"Ethernet" mean …
2012-07-05
05 Ralph Droms Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Ralph Droms
2012-07-05
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-07-05
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-07-05
05 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I agree with Pete's DISCUSS.
2012-07-05
05 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-07-05
05 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
This is strictly for the shepherd and the IESG; authors don't need to do anything about this. Further, my intention is to clear …
2012-07-05
05 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-07-05
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I am balloting "yes" but there are some minor comments from Dave
Sinicrope's Routing Directorate review. Please consider them
before advancing the document …
2012-07-05
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-07-04
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
1. In section 4:

  This document recommends tunneling Neighbor discovery packets inside
  another IPv6 packet that uses a destination option to …
2012-07-04
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]

1. I'm curious about the use of "Ethernet" as an adjective
throughout the document.  For example, in the abstract, what does
"Ethernet" mean …
2012-07-04
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-07-04
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Former DISCUSS points, now resolved [3 July]:

1. Suresh has confirmed that the NOT RECOMMENDED text in Section 2 is correctly meant in …
2012-07-04
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-04
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Picking up on Stephen's point about referring the LIO referring to "subscriber premise."  The last sentence of s3 does use this term so …
2012-07-04
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-07-03
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
These should be a really easy DISCUSS points to sort out, with one round of... well, discussion.

*** Point 1:
-- Section 2, …
2012-07-03
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Non-blocking comments;  no need to respond to these:

Authors:
Thank you for being very clear in the IANA Considerations.

*** A note to …
2012-07-03
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-07-03
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-07-03
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-07-02
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-07-02
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-07-02
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- Just want to check, I'm fairly sure no change is needed but
just in case... Is there any way in which the …
2012-07-02
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-07-02
05 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-28
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2012-06-28
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-07-05
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman Ballot has been issued
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman Created "Approve" ballot
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-25
05 Brian Haberman State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-06-19
05 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-6man-lineid-05 and has the following comments:

IANA understands that upon approval of this document, there are two IANA actions
which must be …
2012-06-18
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-06-07
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2012-06-07
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2012-06-04
05 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <ipv6@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-lineid-05.txt> (The Line …
2012-06-04
05 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-06-04
05 Brian Haberman Last call was requested
2012-06-04
05 Brian Haberman Last call announcement was generated
2012-06-04
05 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2012-06-04
05 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was generated
2012-06-04
05 Brian Haberman State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-06-03
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-06-03
05 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-05.txt
2012-05-03
04 Brian Haberman Changed protocol writeup
2012-05-02
04 Brian Haberman Review comments posted to 6MAN mailing list and stored in datatracker as a comment.
2012-05-02
04 Brian Haberman State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation
2012-05-02
04 Brian Haberman
All,
    Here are my comments on the LineID draft.  It is in pretty good shape, but I would like these issues addressed before …
2012-05-02
04 Brian Haberman State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-05-02
04 Cindy Morgan
Document Write up for <draft-ietf-6man-lineid-04.txt> UPDATED V2

(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why …
2012-04-27
04 Cindy Morgan
UPDATED Writeup:

Title : The Line Identification Destination Option
Author(s) : Suresh Krishnan
Alan Kavanagh
Balazs Varga
Sven Ooghe
Erik Nordmark
Filename : draft-ietf-6man-lineid-04.txt
Pages …
2012-04-27
04 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of RFC? …
2012-04-27
04 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Bob Hinden (bob.hinden@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd. '
2012-04-27
04 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Experimental
2012-04-27
04 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-03-09
04 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-04.txt
2012-03-02
03 Suresh Krishnan New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-03.txt
2011-10-31
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-02.txt
2011-09-15
02 (System) Document has expired
2011-03-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-01.txt
2010-12-20
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-lineid-00.txt