The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS
RFC 6805
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
I have no problems with the publication of this document and only have the following comment. - The discussion of objective functions seems incomplete. Section 4.1 talks about deriving an optimal end-to-end path based on an OF or set of OFs. However, in talking with one of the authors, it became clear that the same OF (or set of OFs) may not be applied across all domains given local policy within a domain and/or contractual arrangements between domains. I think it would be useful to add some discussion of these types of issues and the impact they will have on the optimality of the computed path.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
TED is used before being defined (on p11)
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse