Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT)
RFC 6817

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-11-30 10 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14 10 (System) Notify list changed from ledbat-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion@ietf.org, shalunov@shlang.com to (None)
2012-12-19 10 (System) RFC published
2012-10-29 10 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-10-25 10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-10-25 10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-10-25 10 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-10-25 10 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-10-25 10 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-10-25 10 Wesley Eddy State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-10-22 10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concerns.
2012-10-22 10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-10-19 10 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss points.  I've changed my position to No Objection.
2012-10-19 10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-09-26 10 Benoit Claise [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS/COMMENT
2012-09-26 10 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-09-25 10 Janardhan Iyengar New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-10.txt
2012-05-24 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation
2012-05-24 09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-05-24 09 Benoit Claise
[Ballot discuss]
1. Since "LEDBAT is an experimental delay-based congestion control mechanism", I was wondering when the LEDBAT is not appropriate.
And I was very ...
2012-05-24 09 Benoit Claise
[Ballot comment]
OLD:
  The
  International Telecommunication Union's (ITU's) Recommendation G.114
  defines a delay of 150 ms to be acceptable ...
2012-05-24 09 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-05-24 09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-05-23 09 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I would be somewhat more comfortable with a "warning label", perhaps
as a new section 2.3, that explicitly describes safe deployment
scenarios ...
2012-05-23 09 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Minor editorial issue: I don't understand this sentence at the end of
section 4.2.1:

  As closer the extra delay ...
2012-05-23 09 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-05-23 09 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-05-23 09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-23 09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-05-23 09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]

There are a lot of timing assumptions and many specific references to NTP.
The draft should go to the TICTOC and NTP WGs ...
2012-05-23 09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
Given that the base delay is constant,

SB> It's not completely constant in the face of routing changes

======

  implementation as a ...
2012-05-23 09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-05-22 09 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-05-21 09 Wesley Eddy
2012-05-21 09 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
Had the same security question Stephen had.
2012-05-21 09 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
A nit:
-- Section 2 --
The second sentence looks like it needs to be split in two after "however", perhaps with a colon.

Mail ...
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
A nit:
-- Section 2 --
The second sentence looks like it needs to be split in two after "however", perhaps with a colon.

Mail ...
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba Ballot comment text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
The answer to this might well be "We're OK as we are," but I want to discuss it:

I understand that the ...
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba [Ballot comment]
A nit:
-- Section 2 --
The second sentence looks like it needs to be split in two after "however", perhaps with a colon.
2012-05-21 09 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-05-21 09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
One security/2119 question and a bunch of nits on what's a good
document.

section 7 - you say a protocol using LEDBAD ...
2012-05-21 09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-05-21 09 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-05-17 09 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I am happy to see this document being published.  I only have a minor, non-blocking, comment.

In several places within the document ...
2012-05-17 09 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-05-14 09 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2012-05-14 09 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-05-14 09 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-14 09 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2012-05-10 09 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-05-24
2012-05-10 09 Wesley Eddy State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-05-07 09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-05-04 09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty.
2012-04-30 09 Pearl Liang IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion.
2012-04-26 09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2012-04-26 09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kathleen Moriarty
2012-04-23 09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2012-04-23 09 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org ...
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy Last call was requested
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy Last call announcement was generated
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy Ballot approval text was generated
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was generated
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy Changed protocol writeup
2012-04-23 09 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-04-18 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2012-04-18 09 Cindy Morgan
1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of RFC ...
2012-04-18 09 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Murari Sridharan (muraris@microsoft.com) is the Document Shepherd.'
2011-10-31 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-09.txt
2011-10-09 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-08.txt
2011-09-16 09 Wesley Eddy Intended Status has been changed to Experimental from None
2011-09-16 09 Wesley Eddy Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-07-11 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-07.txt
2011-06-01 09 Wesley Eddy Request for Early review by TSVDIR is assigned to Mark Allman
2011-05-31 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-06.txt
2011-05-10 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-05.txt
2011-03-14 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-04.txt
2010-10-25 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-03.txt
2010-07-12 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-02.txt
2010-03-22 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-01.txt
2009-10-20 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-00.txt