Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
RFC 6823

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from isis-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-genapp@ietf.org to (None)
2013-02-27
04 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC6823
2012-12-22
04 (System) RFC published
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Gonzalo Camarillo
2011-04-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-04-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2011-04-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-04-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-04-13
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-04-12
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-04-12
04 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-04-12
04 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-04-12
04 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-04-12
04 Stewart Bryant Approval announcement text changed
2011-04-12
04 Stewart Bryant Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-04-12
04 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2011-04-01
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-17
04 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-03-17
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I support Lars' discuss.

Deployment of advanced IS-IS security mechanisms (e.g., RFC 5310 authentication) is something I
personally advocate.  However, if an IS-IS ...
2011-03-17
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-17
04 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-17
04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-16
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
I share Lars' allergy to using routing protocols to transport generic information. Maybe we should start thinking about a generic information transport protocol.
2011-03-15
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-15
04 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-15
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I dislike overloading protocols with exchanges of information that do not relate to the protocol functionality. However, at this phase, if the working ...
2011-03-15
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-15
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Most of the items in my original DISCUSS were addressed with edits which I find fully acceptable. Thanks for addressing these.

I still ...
2011-03-07
04 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-03-17
2010-12-12
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for this draft, it is a necessary addition to the IS-IS family and for your work to address my Discusses and ...
2010-12-12
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2010-12-07
04 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-11-16
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] Position for Gonzalo Camarillo has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-11-10
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-11-10
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04.txt
2010-10-07
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-07
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Robert Sparks
2010-10-07
04 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I support the publication of this document and I think it is a good
and proper addition to the ISIS protocol.

However, I ...
2010-10-07
04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-10-06
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-10-06
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The sole statement in the security considerations:

  This document raises no new security issues for IS-IS.

I don't think that is quite ...
2010-10-06
04 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I support Lars' discuss,
2010-10-06
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The sole statement in the security considerations:

  This document raises no new security issues for IS-IS.

I don't think that is quite ...
2010-10-06
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Assuming that Lars' clarification (no impact on IS-IS) is implemented, I would agree with the sole statement in the
security considerations:

  This ...
2010-10-06
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-10-06
04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I support Dan's discuss points.

The document could better motivate the need for a generic container. Could it explicitly call out the existing ...
2010-10-06
04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
What is the current status of isis-mi? How stable is it? (Specifically, how likely is it that changes there would cause this document ...
2010-10-06
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-10-06
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-10-06
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
1. I dislike overloading protocols with exchanges of information that do not relate to the protocol functionality. However, at this phase, if the ...
2010-10-06
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-06
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot discuss]
Abstracts should not have normative language. This has been pointed out at the COMMENT level but I think this is a DISCUSS-level concern.
2010-10-06
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-10-05
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Thank you for this draft, it is a necessary addition to the IS-IS family. I look forward to moving to a "Yes" ballot ...
2010-10-05
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) Never seen 2119 language in Abstract.  Is this allowed by the RFC editor?

2) Spell out LSP on first occurrence.

3) Sec ...
2010-10-05
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-10-04
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I don't think it is helpful to use RFC 2119 language in the Abstract.

---

I think that the RFC Editor will ask ...
2010-10-04
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Thank you for this draft, it is a necessary addition to the IS-IS family. I look forward to moving to a "Yes" ballot ...
2010-10-04
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-04
04 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
(Non-actionable comment: I will likely abstain on this document even when the above change is made. The reason is that I'm allergic against ...
2010-10-04
04 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
I'm missing a crystal clear statement in a very visible spot that the content exchanged in GENINFO TLVs MUST NOT alter the behavior ...
2010-10-04
04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-10-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
The abstract says "SHOULD be advertised" and "SHOULD be used", but conformance language does not belong in the abstract.

Please unpack acronyms on ...
2010-10-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5 states that "flooding of information not directly related to the use of the IS-IS protocol in support of routing degrades the ...
2010-10-01
04 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-09-15
04 Stewart Bryant Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-10-07 by Stewart Bryant
2010-09-15
04 Stewart Bryant State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Stewart Bryant
2010-09-15
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2010-09-15
04 Stewart Bryant Ballot has been issued by Stewart Bryant
2010-09-15
04 Stewart Bryant Created "Approve" ballot
2010-08-23
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-16
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Radia Perlman.
2010-08-13
04 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-08-13
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-13
04 Cindy Morgan Last Call began 2010-08-06, and is scheduled to end 2010-08-20.  See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg07756.html
2010-08-11
04 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call Comments:

IANA has a single question about the IANA Actions in this document.

IANA understands that there are two actions that need ...
2010-08-07
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman
2010-08-07
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Radia Perlman
2010-08-06
04 Stewart Bryant Last Call was requested by Stewart Bryant
2010-08-06
04 Stewart Bryant State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested::AD Followup by Stewart Bryant
2010-08-06
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-08-06
04 (System) Last call text was added
2010-08-06
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-07-08
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-07-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-03.txt
2010-06-28
04 Stewart Bryant State Changes to Publication Requested::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Stewart Bryant
2010-06-28
04 Stewart Bryant
This is a well written draft and I only have one comment:

This draft needs text to define the IANA criteria for allocating Application Identifiers ...
2010-06-28
04 Stewart Bryant Note field has been cleared by Stewart Bryant
2010-03-31
04 Adrian Farrel Responsible AD has been changed to Stewart Bryant from Ross Callon
2010-03-15
04 Ross Callon
PROTO write up for: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-02.txt by Chris Hopps.

Shepherding WG-Chair: Chris Hopps (chopps@rawdofmt.org)

    Q1) Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-03-15
04 Ross Callon Draft Added by Ross Callon in state Publication Requested
2010-01-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-02.txt
2008-12-22
04 (System) Document has expired
2008-06-21
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-01.txt
2007-10-31
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-00.txt