The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
RFC 6830

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
24 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes a network-layer-based protocol that enables separation of IP addresses into two new numbering ...
2015-10-14
24 (System) Notify list changed from lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp@ietf.org to (None)
2013-06-26
24 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC6830
2013-01-25
24 (System) RFC published
2012-11-13
24 Dino Farinacci New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-24.txt
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Wesley Eddy
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
23 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-05
23 Dino Farinacci New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-23.txt
2012-05-04
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-05-04
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2012-05-04
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-05-01
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-05-01
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-05-01
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-04-30
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-04-25
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-04-03
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-03-16
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-02-14
22 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-02-13
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-02-13
22 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-13
22 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-13
22 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-13
22 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-02-13
22 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-13
22 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-02-12
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
It's been a long haul, but revision -22 addresses all of my remaining Discuss issues. I hope the quality and utility of the ...
2012-02-12
22 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-12
22 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-22.txt
2012-02-10
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have updated my Comment for revision -21 and after further discussions with the authors.

---

Section 2

  Routing Locators (RLOCs), which ...
2012-02-10
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have updated my Comment for revision -21 and after further discussions with the authors.

---

Section 2

  Routing Locators (RLOCs), which ...
2012-02-10
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Discuss updated for revision -21 and after further discussions with authors.

---

Section 2

  One database design that is being developed
  ...
2012-02-09
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Added, relative to -21, to replace my previous Discuss on -19:

This text is included in the definition of EID:

      ...
2012-02-09
22 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-08
22 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
(cleared all of my DISCUSS points except one below that is converted into a COMMENT)

If both the N bit and V bit ...
2012-02-08
22 Wesley Eddy [Ballot discuss]
2012-02-08
22 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-07
22 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
The disclaimers added in the last two revisions of this document make it suitable for publication as EXPERIMENTAL
2012-02-07
22 Ron Bonica [Ballot discuss]
.
2012-02-07
22 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-07
22 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concerns
2012-02-07
22 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-07
21 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-21.txt
2012-01-31
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have updated my Discuss to remove a major point resolved in the
-20 revision. I will return to look at the other ...
2012-01-22
22 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2012-01-22
20 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-20.txt
2012-01-20
22 Elwyn Davies Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Elwyn Davies.
2012-01-19
22 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-01-19
22 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-19
22 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-01-19
22 Jari Arkko Dino replied to IANA on December 14th, which seems to clear the IANA issues.
2012-01-19
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
"Tunnel Router".  - should he in the definitions section as a generic type since you say it is a fundamental component.

==========

5.1.  ...
2012-01-19
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
Having re-read the document and having reviewed some of the other LISP documents I am updating my discuss.

The fundamental problem is understanding ...
2012-01-19
22 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-18
22 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. I support Pete's COMMENT and Adrian's DISCUSS about the need to make more clear the goals of the experiment, the criteria of ...
2012-01-18
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
.

Success Criteria
============
Please be specific about success criteria for this experiment. What outcome must an experimenter observe in order to consider ...
2012-01-17
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Fifth item delete......

Success Criteria
============
Please be specific about success criteria for this experiment. What outcome must an experimenter observe in order ...
2012-01-17
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Updated to refer to rev -19

I'd like to see a mention of the complementary observation that
using a single ID-LOC avoids the ...
2012-01-17
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Updated to refer to rev -19

I'd like to see a mention of the complementary observation that
using a single ID-LOC avoids the ...
2012-01-17
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated to refer to rev -19

EIDs are defined to be "not routable on the public
Internet."  What are the global uniqueness properties ...
2012-01-17
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Updated again, adding a fifth point.

Success Criteria
============
Please be specific about success criteria for this experiment. What outcome must an experimenter ...
2012-01-17
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Updated again, adding a fourth point.

Success Criteria
============
Please be specific about success criteria for this experiment. What outcome must an experimenter ...
2012-01-16
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Joel points out that the second part of my DISCUSS is redundant with Adrian's. So, I will withdraw that part of the DISCUSS ...
2012-01-16
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
This was a discuss, but on the basis that the lisp WG re-chartering
will address the issue, I'm clearing.

#12, It looks from ...
2012-01-16
22 Stephen Farrell [Ballot discuss]
2012-01-16
22 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-16
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
The following is an updated DISCUSS

Success Criteria
============
Please be specific about success criteria for this experiment. What outcome must an experimenter ...
2012-01-12
22 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2012-01-12
22 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2012-01-12
22 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-01-19
2012-01-08
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have updated my Discuss to remove the issues resolved in the -19
revision.

---

I'm inclined to agree with Russ that this ...
2012-01-08
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have updated my Comment to remove those points that you have addressed
in revision -19 (thanks).

---

The architectural overview in Section ...
2012-01-08
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have updated my Discuss to remove the issues resolved in the -19
revision.

---

I'm inclined to agree with Russ that this ...
2012-01-06
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this was a lot of discuss points, its now just one which is
really the same as my discuss point on lisp-ms ...
2012-01-05
19 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-19.txt
2012-01-05
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(A) (was discuss #4) 5.4.1 says that reassembly (if needed) happens at the destination
and not the ETR, but then later says that ...
2012-01-05
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this was a lot of discuss points, its now a lot fewer:-)
           
#1 cleared

#2, How ...
2011-12-15
18 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-18.txt
2011-12-13
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Experimental Status (Was Issue 1)
=================================
In the Introduction, please add text that describes what you expect to learn from the experiment. The ...
2011-12-13
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Experimental Status (Was Issue 1)
=================================
In the Introduction, please add text that describes what you expect to learn from the experiment. The ...
2011-12-13
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Experimental Status (Was Issue 1)
=================================
In the Introduction, please add text that describes what you expect to learn from the experiment. The ...
2011-12-13
22 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
2011-12-13
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated based on -17.  #2 I cleared, but I am still curious about #1.

#1) s5.3: LISP Nonce: Trying to figure out why ...
2011-12-13
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this was a lot of discuss points, its now a lot fewer:-)
           
#1 cleared

#2, How ...
2011-12-13
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- intro: says "non-routable EIDs" - are there no cases where EIDs are
routed? There are - you say they may be used ...
2011-12-13
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this is a lot of discuss points, most should be easily
resolved especially since this is just going for experimental.

#1 cleared ...
2011-12-08
22 Amanda Baber
IANA has questions about the IANA actions in this document. IANA
understands that, upon approval of this document, there are four actions
which IANA must ...
2011-12-06
22 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-06
17 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-17.txt
2011-12-01
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Issues 5, 8 have been dropped from the Discuss.

Experimental Status (Was Issue 1)
=================================
Near the top of the document, please add ...
2011-12-01
22 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-01
22 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-12-01
22 Jari Arkko [Ballot discuss]
Holding a DISCUSS until IANA provides a review, that has not arrived yet but should in a couple of days.
2011-12-01
22 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2011-12-01
22 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I'm clearing, trusting the shepherd and responsible AD to ensure that the informative references point to to appropriate places. In particular, please verify ...
2011-12-01
22 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-01
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
s5: r/It is recommended in IPv4/It is RECOMMENDED in IPv4 ?

s5.3: LISP Nonce: I looked in s6.3.1 for the obligatory reference to ...
2011-12-01
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) s5.3: LISP Nonce: Trying to figure out why you'd resend the same nonce.  It seems like you're using it for reachability purposes? ...
2011-12-01
22 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-01
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- intro: says "non-routable EIDs" - are there no cases where EIDs are
routed? There are - you say they may be used ...
2011-12-01
22 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
While this is a lot of discuss points, most should be easily
resolved especially since this is just going for experimental.

#1 EID-to-RLOC ...
2011-12-01
22 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-01
22 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-01
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
o  End-systems (hosts) only send to addresses which are EIDs.  They
      don't know addresses are EIDs versus RLOCs but assume ...
2011-12-01
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
The document needs to be clearer on what happens when the traffic is a high volume UDP source that only transmits occasionally. Say ...
2011-12-01
22 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-11-30
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Experimental Status
===================
What are the success criteria for this experiment? Is the experiment successful if LISP is deployed at a non-trivial number ...
2011-11-30
22 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Experimental Status
===================
What are the success criteria for this experiment? Is the experiment successful if LISP is deployed at a non-trivial number ...
2011-11-30
22 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-30
22 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Experiments are good. Although I share Pete's and Adrian's concerns about the scope of the experiment and the parameters for evaluating its success, ...
2011-11-30
22 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
22 Elwyn Davies Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Elwyn Davies.
2011-11-30
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
My apologies for the changes to the Comments.  Reading
draft-ietf-lisp-alt raised a couple of new questions about
this doc.

I'll take this opportunity ...
2011-11-30
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I made a minor, non-substantive edit to these Comments
on 11/30.

I'll take this opportunity to get on a soapbox for a moment ...
2011-11-30
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I added this Discuss and changed my position to
Discuss on 11/30.

In reading draft-ietf-lisp-alt, I discovered I have a
technical question about ...
2011-11-30
22 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-11-30
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
o  End-systems (hosts) only send to addresses which are EIDs.  They
      don't know addresses are EIDs versus RLOCs but assume ...
2011-11-30
22 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
22 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
o  End-systems (hosts) only send to addresses which are EIDs.  They
      don't know addresses are EIDs versus RLOCs but assume ...
2011-11-30
22 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. I support Pete's COMMENT and Adrian's DISCUSS about the need to make more clear the goals of the experiment, the criteria of ...
2011-11-30
22 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. I support Pete and Adrian's DISCUSSes about the need to make more clear the goals of the experiment, the criteria of success ...
2011-11-30
22 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Abstract

What is a "network-based protocol"?

---

Please expand acronyms on first use. For example, xTRs.

---              ...
2011-11-30
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I'm inclined to agree with Russ that this is well-enough specified for
an experimental status document, but I have some concerns.

I don't ...
2011-11-30
22 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-30
22 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-11-29
22 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
In Section 5.3, UDP Checksum discussion, the reference to draft-eubanks-chimento-6man should probably be to draft-ietf-6man-udpzero instead.

In section 5.4.1, what is "an architectural ...
2011-11-29
22 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
If both the N bit and V bit MUST NOT be set in the same packet, then why would there be any rule ...
2011-11-29
22 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-29
22 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I'll take this opportunity to get on a soapbox for a moment and ask
for two bits of "truth in advertising" in the ...
2011-11-29
22 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
22 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
LISP sounds like a serious protocol experiment. I would have liked there to be more discussion in either the document or in the ...
2011-11-29
22 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
22 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
This is going for experimental, and I think it clears the bar for
  experimental.  However, I think Section 6 could be much ...
2011-11-29
22 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
22 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
Consider tightening the 3 steps listed in section 5.4.1. Step 2 is really the place you calculated L based on S and H.
2011-11-29
22 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
This document is almost ready for publication as Experimental, but I would like to ask about the status of some of the Informative ...
2011-11-29
22 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-28
22 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-11-28
22 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-11-28
22 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-11-24
22 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Matt Lepinski
2011-11-24
22 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Matt Lepinski
2011-11-17
22 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2011-11-17
22 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2011-11-14
22 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01
2011-11-13
22 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-11-13
22 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-11-13
22 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-11-13
22 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-11-13
22 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-11-13
22 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-11-13
22 (System) Last call text was added
2011-11-13
22 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-11-04
22 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New ID Needed
2011-11-04
16 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-16.txt
2011-10-23
22 Jari Arkko
I have now completed my review.

In general, I'm quite happy with the document. There were of course a number of issues, even some technical ...
2011-10-22
22 Jari Arkko
This is the last part of my review, as far as the actual document contents go. I will send another summary e-mail.

Technical:

> 14.1.  ...
2011-10-19
22 Jari Arkko
I'm still continuing my review. I've now read halfway through Section 11, and hope to complete the review by Friday.

Technical:

> 6.3.  Routing Locator ...
2011-10-13
22 Jari Arkko
Still more parts in my review. I have now read until the beginning of Section 6.3.1. Some of these comments may change as I have ...
2011-10-11
22 Jari Arkko
Continuing my review:

Technical:

> LISP Nonce:  The LISP nonce field is a 24-bit value that is randomly
> generated by an ITR when the ...
2011-10-03
22 Jari Arkko
Continuing with my review. Many of the observations below are questions. I may understand many of these better once I finish the whole document, but ...
2011-09-30
22 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
2011-09-30
22 Jari Arkko
I am reviewing this draft. Here's the first part of my review. So far I like what I've seen, but there are a few small ...
2011-09-07
22 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-07-28
22 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Joel Halpern is the Shepherd and has reviewed this version
and believes it is ready to be forwarded to the IESG.

(1.b) The document ...
2011-07-28
22 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-28
22 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Joel Halpern (jmh@joelhalpern.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-09
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-15.txt
2011-06-29
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-14.txt
2011-06-21
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-13.txt
2011-04-26
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-12.txt
2011-03-29
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-11.txt
2011-03-04
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt
2010-10-11
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-09.txt
2010-08-13
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt
2010-04-26
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-07.txt
2010-01-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt
2009-09-30
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-05.txt
2009-09-16
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-04.txt
2009-07-27
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-03.txt
2009-07-10
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-02.txt
2009-05-29
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-01.txt
2009-05-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-00.txt