Skip to main content

Interworking between Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) and Non-LISP Sites
RFC 6832

Yes

(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-03-04)
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and Hoovering up my Comments
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05)

                            
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05)

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2012-03-06)
0. Thanks for addressing my issue regarding private addresses in section 7.2

1. Thanks for adding Figure 1.  Section 7.2 (discussing private addresses)
might benefit from an extension to Figure 1 that demonstrates where the
NAT function fits.

2. Cleared.

3. Cleared.

4. Cleared.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05)

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05)

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04)

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-02-29 for -05)
- Its not clear to me that the mapping system can reliably know
that all non-LISP IP addresses are in fact not EIDs. But I'm
willing to suspend disbelief for the experiment:-)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-02-29 for -05)
Default Free Zone (DFZ) should have a reference, if only a forward ref to section 2 when you first use it in section 1

====

Asymmetry is a problem with certain types of application, NTP for example. It would be useful if there was some discussion on the relative degree of asymmetry imposed by these LISP solutions vs the degree of asymmetry in the existing Internet, and a note made about the impact of asymmetry on applications
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05)