Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Server Interface
RFC 6833

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
16 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes the Mapping Service for the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP), implemented by two new ...
2015-10-14
16 (System) Notify list changed from lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-ms@ietf.org to (None)
2014-09-26
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6833
2013-01-25
16 (System) RFC published
2012-08-22
16 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
16 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22
16 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2012-03-13
16 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-03-09
16 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-03-08
16 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-03-07
16 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Perfect. Thank you for working to address my concerns.
2012-03-07
16 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-06
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concerns
2012-03-06
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-05
16 Dino Farinacci New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-16.txt
2012-02-11
15 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
There needs to be a ref to section 15 of base in this document
and there needs to be an issues warning in ...
2012-02-11
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-31
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
We are nearly there.

draft-ief-lisp-20 now contains sufficient caveats to satisfy my issue on that document.

My remaining point on this draft can ...
2012-01-16
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
After much discussion I didn't manage to convince the authors to
add good-looking text on this, so eventually, I folded on this.

#2 ...
2012-01-16
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
I have a discuss on -19 of the base document relating to the ability
to replay map register messages. See the discuss on ...
2012-01-16
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-12
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for taking notice of and addressing my Comments
2012-01-12
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for atking notice of and addressing my Comments
2012-01-12
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Updated Discuss for version -15

Thanks for addressing all but my "scope qualification" issue. I will
continue to discuss this with the ADs ...
2012-01-11
15 Jari Arkko Document placed on today's informal IESG telechat to try to clear the remaining issues.
2012-01-11
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-15.txt
2012-01-06
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
After much discussion I didn't manage to convince the authors to
add good-looking text on this, so eventually, I folded;-)

#2 This discuss ...
2012-01-06
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
I have a discuss on -19 of the base document relating to the ability
to replay map register messages. See the discuss on ...
2012-01-03
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
#1 Updated discuss after reviewing [LISP]. Other points were cleared in -13
of this one.

I have a discuss on -18 of the ...
2012-01-03
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
#1 Updated discuss after reviewing [LISP]. Other points were cleared in -13
of this one.

I have a discuss on -17 of the ...
2011-12-20
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.2:
Section 4.4

In bullet number 2, you describe how the caching map generates a new nonce, stores that nonce and uses ...
2011-12-20
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-16
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-14.txt
2011-12-13
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.2:
Section 4.4

In bullet number 2, you describe how the caching map generates a new nonce, stores that nonce and uses ...
2011-12-13
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Updated discuss after reviewing [LISP]. Other points were cleared in -13
of this one.

I have a discuss on -17 of the base ...
2011-12-06
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-13.txt
2011-10-25
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-10-25
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-25
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-12.txt
2011-10-15
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Updated the first point of my Discuss after conversation with Jari to add details of what I would like to see.

The LISP ...
2011-10-06
15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-10-06
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-10-06
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Updated the first point of my Discuss after conversation with Jari to add details of what I would like to see.

The LISP ...
2011-10-06
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2011-10-06
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I find it very regrettable that this document was brough forward for
IESG review before the architecture and protocol on which it depends. ...
2011-10-06
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
The LISP Charter says (of the WG)...
Its
specifications are Experimental and labeled with accurate disclaimers
about their limitations and not fully understood ...
2011-10-06
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-06
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I agree with Ron.

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document,
LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated..again..

#1) (no action required) I get know why the doc primarily talks about LISP+ALT.

#2) s4.2 contains the following:

  A Map-Register ...
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated..

#1) s1 introduces the idea of multiple databases (NERD, CONS, LISP+ALT), but the rest of the document only discusses LISP+ALT.  Does the ...
2011-10-06
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-06
15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) I support Stephen's discusses.

#2) s1: I support Ron's discuss about the term "Map Server" is overloaded.

#3) Half-tongue-in-cheek: what no ping ...
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) I support Stephen's discusses.

#2) s1: I support Ron's discuss about the term "Map Server" is overloaded.

#3) Half-tongue-in-cheek what no ping ...
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
s1 introduces the idea of multiple databases (NERD, CONS, LISP+ALT), but the rest of the document only discusses LISP+ALT.  Does the rest of ...
2011-10-06
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-06
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Section 1, 2nd para says that a "Map Server" can be a "Map Resolver"
or a "Map Server" - huh? Terminology a ...
2011-10-06
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(added a few more points following further reading)

- Section 2, definition of Map Server (and elsewhere) refers to *the*
distributed mapping database. ...
2011-10-05
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I support the first 2 parts of Stephen's DISCUSS
2011-10-05
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss has been updated yet again, based on information gleaned from the versioning draft)

General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the ...
2011-10-05
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss has been updated yet again, based on information gleaned from the versioning draft)

General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the ...
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss has been updated)

General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been ...
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss has been updated)

General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been ...
2011-10-05
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Section 1, 2nd para says that a "Map Server" can be a "Map Resolver"
or a "Map Server" - huh? Terminology a ...
2011-10-05
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(added a few more points following further reading)

- Section 2, definition of Map Server (and elsewhere) refers to *the*
distributed mapping database. ...
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss has been updated)

General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been ...
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.

General:

Where are ...
2011-10-05
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.

General:

Where are ...
2011-10-05
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Section 1, 2nd para says that a "Map Server" can be a "Map Resolver"
or a "Map Server" - huh? Terminology a ...
2011-10-05
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
- Section 2, definition of Map Server (and elsewhere) refers to *the*
distributed mapping database. But you've previously said there are
multiple schemes ...
2011-10-05
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.

General:

Where are ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.

General:

Where are ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document, LISP ALT  and LISP SEC have been reviewed.

General:

Where are ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document and LISP ALT have been reviewed.

General:

Where are the trust ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document and LISP ALT have been reviewed.

General:

Where are the trust ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.2

You say:

"In addition to the set of EID-prefixes defined for each ETR that may register, a Map Server is typically ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before the LISP base document and LISP ALT have been reviewed.

General:

Where are the trust ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
General:

Who operates the Map Server? Where are its trust boundaries?

Section 1:

In the second paragraph of Section 1, you say:

"There ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 1:

In the second paragraph of Section 1, you say:

"There are two types of operation for a LISP Map Server: as ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 1:

In the second paragraph of Section 1, you say:

"There are two types of operation for a LISP Map Server: as ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 1:

In the second paragraph of Section 1, you say:

"There are two types of operation for a LISP Map Server: as ...
2011-10-04
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-30
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-28
15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-09-22
15 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-09-14
15 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-09-14
15 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-10-06
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-09-14
15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-09-14
15 (System) Last call text was added
2011-09-14
15 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this specification. I think it is ready to move forward, and I have sent it to IETF Last Call. I did see ...
2011-09-07
15 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-08-30
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-11.txt
2011-07-28
15 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Joel Halpern is the Shepherd and has reviewed this version
and believes it is ready to be forwarded to the IESG.

(1.b) The document ...
2011-07-28
15 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-28
15 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Joel Halpern (jmh@joelhalpern.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-07
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-10.txt
2011-06-30
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-09.txt
2011-04-28
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-08.txt
2011-03-13
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-07.txt
2010-10-18
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-06.txt
2010-04-26
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-05.txt
2010-04-09
15 (System) Document has expired
2009-10-06
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-04.txt
2009-10-02
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-03.txt
2009-09-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-02.txt
2009-05-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-01.txt
2009-05-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-ms-00.txt