Specifying Civic Address Extensions in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)
RFC 6848

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2016-11-30
10 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from geopriv-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic@ietf.org to (None)
2013-02-27
10 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC6848
2013-01-15
10 (System) RFC published
2012-12-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-12-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-12-14
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-12-07
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-12-06
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-12-06
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-12-06
10 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-12-06
10 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-12-06
10 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-12-06
10 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-12-05
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Version -10 fixes up my discuss points. Thanks!

- 3.2: I assume the length field includes the two spaces
so the description below ...
2012-12-05
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-12-04
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-12-04
10 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-10.txt
2012-11-01
09 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2012-10-25
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-10-25
09 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document.

I think the Security Considerations section would benefit from a direct
reference to ...
2012-10-25
09 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment text updated for Adrian Farrel
2012-10-25
09 BenoƮt Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-10-25
09 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-10-25
09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-10-25
09 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-10-25
09 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
3.2

Using space as a separator means that local name can have no spaces in it. Is that guaranteed by XML? Is there ...
2012-10-25
09 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-10-24
09 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-10-24
09 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-10-23
09 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document.

I think the Security Considerations section would benefit from a direct
reference to ...
2012-10-23
09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-10-22
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-10-22
09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
123 Colorado Boulevard is a real address
123A Main Street is likely a real address, there are enough 123Main Streets that one may ...
2012-10-22
09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-10-22
09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-10-22
09 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-10-22
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

I disagree that there are no new security considerations but
these ought be easily fixed. 

- First, this introduces (namespace) URLs into DHCP ...
2012-10-22
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- Can't we use canals.example.com rather than canals.org.uk?
(And same for other examples)

- 3.2: I assume the length field includes the two ...
2012-10-22
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-10-18
09 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed the recent version of draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09 and has the following comments and question:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-10-17
09 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Updated for version -09:

Version -08 addresses my DISCUSS points.
Version -09 addresses my non-blocking comments.

Thanks very much for considering my comments ...
2012-10-17
09 Barry Leiba Ballot comment text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-10-17
09 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09.txt
2012-10-17
08 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Updated for version -08:
Version -08 addresses my DISCUSS points, and thanks very much for the changes.

My remaining comments are non-blocking, but ...
2012-10-17
08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-10-17
08 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-08.txt
2012-10-10
07 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
I'm very confused:
-- Section 3 --
  Unsupported civic address elements can be carried without consequence
  only as long as the ...
2012-10-10
07 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
These are non-blocking, but please consider them seriously, and feel free to chat with me about them:

Because this document massively changes the ...
2012-10-10
07 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-10-09
07 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-10-09
07 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-10-25
2012-10-09
07 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2012-10-09
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-10-09
07 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2012-10-08
07 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-07.txt
2012-10-04
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-10-02
06 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-06 and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are five
actions that IANA needs to ...
2012-09-28
06 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2012-09-28
06 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2012-09-27
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2012-09-27
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad
2012-09-20
06 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <geopriv@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-06.txt> (Specifying Civic ...
2012-09-20
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Last call was requested
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Ballot approval text was generated
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-09-20
06 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was generated
2012-09-19
06 Amy Vezza
The GEOPRIV working group requests publication of draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-06 as a Proposed
Standard.

(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, ...
2012-09-19
06 Amy Vezza Note added 'Alissa Cooper (acooper@cdt.org) is the document shepherd.'
2012-09-19
06 Amy Vezza Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-09-19
06 Amy Vezza IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-09-19
06 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-ietf-geopriv-prefix
2012-09-18
06 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-06.txt
2012-08-23
05 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-05.txt
2012-08-21
04 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-04.txt
2012-02-28
03 James Winterbottom New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-03.txt
2011-10-17
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-02.txt
2011-09-11
02 (System) Document has expired
2011-03-11
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-01.txt
2011-03-07
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-00.txt