Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit
RFC 6870
Revision differences
Document history
Date | By | Action |
---|---|---|
2018-12-20
|
(System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes a mechanism for signaling the active and standby status of redundant Pseudowires (PWs) … Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes a mechanism for signaling the active and standby status of redundant Pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set of Redundant PWs is configured between Provider Edge (PE) nodes in single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications or between Terminating Provider Edge (T-PE) nodes in Multi-Segment Pseudowire (MS-PW) applications. In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is defined. This bit indicates a Preferential Forwarding status with a value of active or standby for each PW in a redundant set. In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to coordinate a switchover operation of the PW. Finally, this document updates RFC 4447 by adding details to the handling of the PW status code bits in the PW Status TLV.') |
2015-10-14
|
(System) | Notify list changed from pwe3-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit@ietf.org to (None) |
2015-04-30
|
Naveen Khan | Posted related IPR disclosure: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 6870 |
2013-02-20
|
(System) | RFC published |