Use Cases and Interpretations of Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Objects for Issuers and Relying Parties
RFC 6907
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
-- Section 1 -- Can we have an expansion of "RPKI" on first use? It's never expanded at all, and it isn't until Section 2.1 that "RPKI" is used alongside a reference to a document where it is expanded. -- Section 4 -- The first sentence doesn't belong in an RFC: it'll be outdated soon after the RFC is published. Just omit it.
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
The authors seem to agree that a few minor changes ought to be made based on the Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies on 19-Dec-2012. See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg08010.html, as well as the replies to that message.
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
- general: I thought the sidr scaling analysis posted recently as a comment on another sidr document was interesting. I wondered how that might affect these use-cases? Not asking that you add all that here but perhaps there are some use-cases where [1] (if correct) might imply that something ought be said about latency. [1] http://techreports.verisignlabs.com/tr-lookup.cgi?trid=1120005&rev=2 - 1.4 has 2119 keywords, but I don't see any of those in upper case - are the lowercase shoulds supposed to be 2119 language or should you just remove 1.4?
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection