Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 6913
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) Yes
This is a fine document, doing a fine thing, and I think it should go forward... but as an Informational document. In other words, I support Pete's DISCUSS (but note that it shouldn't hold anything up: an RFC Editor note can take care of this easily).
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my Discuss
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
A procedural remark: The write-up says "Individual/AD sponsored was the consensus of the DISPATCH WG for this document and the AD(s) agreed to progress the document. There was no controversy around this decision. ". However, for completeness, it would be nice to reference the particular email where this consensus was documented.
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my comments. As written, I believe this is reasonable as a standards track document.
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
I'm amazed that people care about this ...