Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Gonzalo Camarillo) Yes
(Barry Leiba) Yes
Comment (2013-01-21 for -07)
This is a fine document, doing a fine thing, and I think it should go forward... but as an Informational document. In other words, I support Pete's DISCUSS (but note that it shouldn't hold anything up: an RFC Editor note can take care of this easily).
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Benoit Claise) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
Comment (2013-01-23 for -07)
I'm amazed that people care about this ...
(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my Discuss
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Pete Resnick) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my comments. As written, I believe this is reasonable as a standards track document.
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection
Comment (2013-01-20 for -07)
A procedural remark: The write-up says "Individual/AD sponsored was the consensus of the DISPATCH WG for this document and the AD(s) agreed to progress the document. There was no controversy around this decision. ". However, for completeness, it would be nice to reference the particular email where this consensus was documented.