REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol
RFC 6940

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-01-21
26 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag)
2015-12-31
26 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'No Response'
2015-10-14
26 (System) Notify list changed from p2psip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-p2psip-base@ietf.org, dean.willis@softarmor.com to dean.willis@softarmor.com
2014-02-24
26 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC6940
2014-01-16
26 (System) RFC published
2014-01-14
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-10-24
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26
2013-05-06
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from AUTH
2013-04-29
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from RFC-EDITOR
2013-03-27
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-03-27
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from IANA
2013-03-27
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2013-03-26
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-03-26
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2013-03-18
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to IANA from EDIT
2013-03-05
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-02-26
26 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-02-25
26 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-02-25
26 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-02-25
26 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-02-25
26 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-02-25
26 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-02-25
26 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-02-25
26 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-02-25
26 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Followup
2013-02-24
26 Cullen Jennings New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26.txt
2013-02-21
25 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-02-21
25 Cindy Morgan State changed to AD Followup from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-02-20
25 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]

  The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes on 19-Feb-2013 raised one concern
  that needs to be sorted out before this document is …
2013-02-20
25 Russ Housley Ballot discuss text updated for Russ Housley
2013-02-20
25 Cullen Jennings New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-25.txt
2013-02-20
24 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2013-02-19
24 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and all my Comments.
2013-02-19
24 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment text updated for Adrian Farrel
2013-02-19
24 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-02-18
24 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-02-17
24 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2013-02-15
24 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Note: Gonzalo didn't reset the ballot, so I am assuming that there's no need to do a full re-review. So I checked on …
2013-02-15
24 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2013-02-15
24 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon …
2013-02-15
24 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2013-02-15
24 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my suggestions regarding the IESG writeups.

Now I'll get back to completing my review of the doc...
2013-02-15
24 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-02-15
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Thanks again for handling my gigantic discuss/comments last
time around.

I had a (not so quick:-) check of the diffs between -18 and …
2013-02-15
24 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from No Objection
2013-02-15
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot has been issued
2013-02-15
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot writeup was changed
2013-02-13
24 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I haven't finished my review, but I wanted
to post this issue early to give the
document shepherd time to fix the problem …
2013-02-13
24 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2013-02-11
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-02-21
2013-02-08
24 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Mary Barnes
2013-02-08
24 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Mary Barnes
2013-02-05
24 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <p2psip@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt> (REsource LOcation …
2013-02-05
24 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-02-05
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call was requested
2013-02-05
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot approval text was generated
2013-02-05
24 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-02-05
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call announcement was changed
2013-02-05
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Last call announcement was generated
2013-01-28
24 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
This is a well written document, and is much improved over the last version that I read. I thank the editors for the …
2013-01-28
24 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-01-28
24 Gonzalo Camarillo Notification list changed to : p2psip-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-p2psip-base@tools.ietf.org, dean.willis@softarmor.com
2013-01-25
24 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
This is a well written document, and is much improved over the last version that I read.
I would like to thank the …
2013-01-25
24 Stewart Bryant Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stewart Bryant
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
This was a discuss but is now a comment:

(1) "section 3.1: Is collision resistance needed for the case where the
Node-ID is …
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-01-23
24 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and nearly all my Comments by the -24 revision.
I'm impressed by the work.

Sorry if we already …
2013-01-23
24 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Many thanks again for all the work that's gone into -24!

(1) cleared

(2) cleared

(3) cleared

(4) cleared

(5) cleared

(6) cleared …
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
These were discusses and are now comments. The number was
the discuss point.

(1) "section 3.1: Is collision resistance needed for the case …
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

Many thanks again for all the work that's gone into -24!

(1) cleared

(2) cleared

(3) cleared

(4) cleared

(5) cleared

(6) cleared …
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

These were discusses and are now comments. The number was
the discuss point.

(1) "section 3.1: Is collision resistance needed for the case …
2013-01-23
24 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-01-19
24 Cullen Jennings New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt
2012-11-05
23 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-11-05
23 Dean Willis New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-23.txt
2012-09-17
22 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-08-22
22 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-07-23
22 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
- The document seems to be schizophrenic about Head of Line blocking.  The section 6.5.1.6 text on why TCP is not a desirable …
2012-07-23
22 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-17
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have updated my Discuss for revision -22 of the document.

Very good progress. All I am left with is our discussion of …
2012-07-17
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Comment also updated for -22. Many points remain for consideration.

---

Section 1.2

  Topology Plugin:  The Topology Plugin is responsible for implementing …
2012-07-17
22 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Adrian Farrel
2012-07-16
22 Cullen Jennings New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-22.txt
2012-03-28
21 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-28
21 Cullen Jennings New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-21.txt
2012-03-18
20 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-22
20 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Page 38 - Section 5.2.1 - might be worth calling out that the sending node will be doing both e2e and hopbyhop retransmissions …
2012-02-22
20 Robert Sparks [Ballot discuss]
2012-02-22
20 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-21
20 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This document being the principal specification that defines a new protocol I was expecting to find information concerning operational and manageability considerations. Some …
2012-02-21
20 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This document being the principal specification that defines a new protocol I was expecting to find information concerning operational and manageability considerations. Some …
2012-01-20
20 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have not examined revision -20 to see whether my Comments have been addressed. I trust the authors, shepherd and responsible AD to …
2012-01-20
20 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have updated my Discuss for revision -20 of the document by deleting
points that have been addressed, and annotating with ">>"

Thanks …
2012-01-17
20 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
[UPDATED based on -20.]

I'd like to talk about several points that I haven't seen mentioned in
other reviews.

1. Section 1.3 appears …
2012-01-17
20 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-20.txt
2011-10-29
20 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-29
19 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-19.txt
2011-09-08
20 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-08
20 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-09-08
20 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2011-09-08
20 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
DHT is used several times before it is expanded.

---

Section 1.2

  Topology Plugin:  The Topology Plugin is responsible for implementing
  …
2011-09-08
20 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I am convinced that this document will prove to be extremely important
for the future of the Internet. That maybe makes the bar …
2011-09-08
20 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-08
20 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Nothing like getting to your review after there's already 8 lengthy discusses on it.  I'll not be adding anything new (and possibly avoiding …
2011-09-08
20 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-08
20 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This document being the principal specification that defines a new protocol I was expecting to find information concerning operational and manageability considerations. A …
2011-09-08
20 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-07
20 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I have a number of detailed comments/nits below.

==
Bootstrap Node:  A network node used by Joining Peers to help Nlocate
the Admitting …
2011-09-07
20 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I have needed to read draft-ietf-p2psip-base at least three times and
talked with one of the RAI ADs and a couple of the …
2011-09-07
20 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. Regarding communication security, Section 1.3 states:

  Message Level:    Each RELOAD message must be signed.
  Object Level:    Stored objects …
2011-09-07
20 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
I'd like to talk about several points that I haven't seen mentioned in
other reviews.

1. Section 1.3 appears to couple issuance of …
2011-09-07
20 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-07
20 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Page 38 - Section 5.2.1 - might be worth calling out that the sending node will be doing both e2e and hopbyhop retransmissions …
2011-09-07
20 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
(updated to capture config-chord and to make the comments easier to read.)

The document does not appear to register the namespaces urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:p2p:config-base and …
2011-09-07
20 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Page 38 - Section 5.2.1 - might be worth calling out that the sending node
will be doing both e2e and hopbyhop retrasmissions …
2011-09-07
20 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The document does not appear to register the namespace urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:p2p:config-base?

The definition of the fragment field in 5.3.2 (page 43) should be updated …
2011-09-07
20 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-06
20 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
- It may be a good idea near the beginning of section 1 to be clear as
  to whether RELOAD is intended …
2011-09-06
20 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
- It may be a good idea near the beginning of section 1 to be clear as to
  whether RELOAD is intended …
2011-09-06
20 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
Multi-part DISCUSS, which I think requires a document update (and possibly more
discussion, though the email thread between Michael Scharf and Bruce is …
2011-09-06
20 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-06
20 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
3.1 - The concept of "user" appears in this section along with "username", but it never really gets defined, or for that matter …
2011-09-06
20 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-05
20 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
[Still editing these comments. You may answer them, but they may change.]

3.1 - The concept of "user" appears in this section along …
2011-09-05
20 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
So I have a humongous set of discusses and comments on this
humongous document. (Probably some of the comments at
least are because …
2011-09-03
20 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes on 9-August-2011 points out
  significant inconsistencies in the document.  Please resolve these
  inconsistencies.  Please consider …
2011-09-03
20 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-03
20 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
==
Bootstrap Node:  A network node used by Joining Peers to help Nlocate
the Admitting Peer.

"Locate," rather than, "Nlocate?"

==

Routing Table:  …
2011-09-03
20 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I have read the document a couple of times and I concur with the
review from the Routing Directorate:

=====
5.4.2.4 appears to …
2011-09-03
20 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-02
20 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
overall:

- I've got to say that this reads a lot like an experimental
specification. Its so complex and has so many moving …
2011-09-02
20 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
So I have a humongous set of discusses and comments on this
humongous document. (Probably some of the comments at
least are because …
2011-09-02
20 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-08-24
20 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to talk about the topic of vulnerabilities of RELOAD's source routing capability. As you know, source routing mechanisms have had …
2011-08-24
20 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-08-11
20 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer.
2011-08-11
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Telechat date has been changed to 2011-09-08 from 2011-08-25
2011-08-09
20 Adrian Farrel State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation.
2011-08-05
20 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-08-05
20 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2011-08-05
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Ballot has been issued
2011-08-05
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Created "Approve" ballot
2011-08-05
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-08-11
2011-08-04
18 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-18.txt
2011-07-22
20 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-07-20
20 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval, there are sixteen IANA Actions
that must be completed.

First, in the Well-Known URI registry located at:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xml

a new …
2011-07-20
20 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Michael Scharf
2011-07-20
20 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Michael Scharf
2011-07-11
17 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt
2011-07-09
20 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2011-07-09
20 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2011-07-08
20 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-07-08
20 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> …
2011-07-08
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Last Call was requested
2011-07-08
20 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested::AD Followup.
2011-07-08
20 Gonzalo Camarillo Last Call text changed
2011-07-08
20 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-07-08
20 (System) Last call text was added
2011-07-07
20 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-07
16 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-16.txt
2011-07-07
20 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Publication Requested::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested.
2011-07-05
20 Cindy Morgan
1.a) I (David Bryan, as document shepherd) have reviewed the most
recent version of draft-ietf-p2psip-base-15 and found it ready for
publication.

(1.b) The document has …
2011-07-05
20 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-05
20 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'David Bryan (dbryan@ethernot.org) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Per AD comments, working with editors to explain, revise, or correct a number of downrefs.
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway set.
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Changed protocol writeup
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Document publication requested by IESG
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from Adopted by a WG
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan IETF state changed to Adopted by a WG from WG Document
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Document publication requested by IESG.
2011-07-05
20 David Bryan Annotation tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD set.
2011-05-28
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-15.txt
2011-05-28
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-14.txt
2011-03-14
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-13.txt
2010-11-11
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-12.txt
2010-10-12
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-11.txt
2010-08-04
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-10.txt
2010-07-12
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-09.txt
2010-03-09
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-08.txt
2010-02-17
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-07.txt
2009-11-09
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-06.txt
2009-10-23
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-05.txt
2009-10-06
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-04.txt
2009-09-17
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: QUALCOMM Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-p2psip-base-03
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-03.txt
2009-03-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-02.txt
2008-12-12
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-01.txt
2008-10-28
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-p2psip-base-00.txt