Analysis of BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design Guide
RFC 6952
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
Thanks for addressing my concerns.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my Discuss. Please consider moving RFC 6863 to the Normative References.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
I support Sean's and Adrian's DISCUSS points.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
- I agree with Sean's discuss - I think I agree with Adrian's discuss:-) - A nit: last para of section 5: I think you should replace "public/private keys" with "public key certificates [rfc5280]" since there are ways to use asymmetric cryptography without certificates (e.g. ssh-like).
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection