Analysis of BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design Guide
RFC 6952

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) Yes

Comment (2013-04-08)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing my concerns.

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2013-04-08)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing my Discuss.

Please consider moving RFC 6863 to the Normative References.

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2013-01-08 for -06)
No email
send info
- I agree with Sean's discuss

- I think I agree with Adrian's discuss:-)

- A nit: last para of section 5: I think you should replace
"public/private keys" with "public key certificates
[rfc5280]" since there are ways to use asymmetric
cryptography without certificates (e.g. ssh-like).

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2013-01-07 for -06)
No email
send info
I support Sean's and Adrian's DISCUSS points.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection