Problem Statement and Requirements of the Peer-to-Peer Streaming Protocol (PPSP)
RFC 6972

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
15 (System) Notify list changed from ppsp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement@ietf.org to (None)
2013-07-19
15 (System) RFC published
2013-07-19
15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-06-26
15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-06-03
15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-05-16
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-05-16
15 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-05-16
15 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-05-15
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-05-15
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-05-15
15 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-05-15
15 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-05-15
15 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-05-15
15 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-05-15
15 Martin Stiemerling State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-05-13
15 Ning Zong New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-15.txt
2013-04-26
14 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-04-26
14 Ning Zong New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-14.txt
2013-04-15
13 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I was surprised that my old Discuss had popped up when I re-entered the IESG. I have checked the new version, and that ...
2013-04-15
13 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-04-12
13 Martin Stiemerling
the changes out of the IESG review went through another short WGLC and the WG isn't completely happy with the changes. Waiting for an update ...
2013-04-12
13 Martin Stiemerling State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-03-28
13 Martin Stiemerling WGLC caused some comments about the lately added requirements out of the IESG review. Waiting for an updated draft.
2013-02-27
13 Martin Stiemerling Waiting for the WGLC to finish about the changes in the last version.
2013-02-24
13 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS
2013-02-24
13 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-02-22
13 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-13.txt
2013-02-13
12 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Only one issue left.
There are no management and operation requirements in the document: a clear show stopper.
How do you plan on ...
2013-02-13
12 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my COMMENTs
2013-02-13
12 Benoît Claise Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2013-01-31
12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-01-31
12 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-12.txt
2013-01-28
11 Francis Dupont Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2012-12-13
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-12-13
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concern.
2012-12-13
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-12-13
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I appreciate the effort that the authors have put in to revise this
document after the previous evaluation by the IESG. This was ...
2012-12-13
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2012-12-13
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-12-12
11 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
I think that given the protocol spec work PPSP is producing, this document is a helpful record for understanding some of the rationale ...
2012-12-12
11 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2012-12-12
11 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Barry has done a much better job of identifying the issues in Section 6 than I ever could. In addition, I find the ...
2012-12-12
11 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to Abstain from No Record
2012-12-12
11 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Overall, I'm not happy with this document, but I'm having trouble being specific enough to put my objections in as blocking comments (DISCUSSes).  ...
2012-12-12
11 Barry Leiba Ballot comment text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-12-12
11 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Overall, I'm not happy with this document, but I'm having trouble being specific enough to put my objections in as blocking comments (DISCUSSes).  ...
2012-12-12
11 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-12-12
11 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
- There are no management and operation requirements in the document: a clear show stopper.
How do you plan on managing your beast? ...
2012-12-12
11 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
- I'm surprised not to see references to the CDNI work, RFC 6707 and 6770
CDNI is the use case in section 5.1, ...
2012-12-12
11 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-12-10
11 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-12-06
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-12-06
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-12-03
11 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
[Setting back to No Record to remind me to do a new review]

I agree with the DISCUSS comments of Adrian and the ...
2012-12-03
11 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2012-11-27
11 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Record from Yes
2012-11-27
11 Martin Stiemerling Set telechat returning item indication
2012-11-26
11 Martin Stiemerling Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-12-13
2012-11-26
11 Martin Stiemerling State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-11-26
11 Martin Stiemerling Ballot has been issued
2012-11-26
11 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-11-26
11 Martin Stiemerling Ballot writeup was changed
2012-11-26
11 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-11-15
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-11-15
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-11-15
11 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-11, which is
currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-11-12
11 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <ppsp@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-11.txt> (Problem Statement ...
2012-11-12
11 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-11-12
11 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was generated
2012-11-12
11 Martin Stiemerling Last call was requested
2012-11-12
11 Martin Stiemerling Ballot approval text was generated
2012-11-12
11 Martin Stiemerling State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-11-12
11 Martin Stiemerling Last call announcement was changed
2012-11-12
11 Martin Stiemerling The AD review was sent as individual comments to the list before requesting publication:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/current/msg01522.html
and
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ppsp/current/msg01530.html
2012-11-02
11 Martin Stiemerling State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-10-23
11 Amy Vezza State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2012-10-23
11 Amy Vezza
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? ...
2012-10-23
11 Amy Vezza Note changed to 'Stefano Previdi (sprevidi@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-10-19
11 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-11.txt
2012-09-19
10 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-10.txt
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-07-01
09 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-09.txt
2012-03-29
08 Martin Stiemerling Responsible AD changed to Martin Stiemerling from Wesley Eddy
2012-03-28
08 Wesley Eddy
after the merger with the requirements document (done in order to satisfy IESG reviews), this needs to be re-last-called in the working group, as the ...
2012-03-28
08 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD is watching from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-02-28
08 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -08-

This update does not address the discusses I raised for -07-.
I see that the intention is to combine the ...
2012-02-28
08 David Harrington Ballot discuss text updated for David Harrington
2012-02-27
08 Yunfei Zhang New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-08.txt
2011-12-21
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Lt. Mundy.
2011-12-16
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(This was a discuss. A WG chair re-assured me that the "usage"
document in the PPSP charter would address the issue.)
- I ...
2011-12-16
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot discuss]
2011-12-16
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-15
07 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-15
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2011-12-15
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(And one for the authors/chairs...)
- I don't see what PPSP WG document will include "considerations on
threats and mitigations when combining both ...
2011-12-15
07 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I agree with the DISCUSS comments of Adrian and the second DISCUSS comment of David. I think there's a lot of unnecessary (and ...
2011-12-15
07 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-15
07 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I find the document useful in intent but problematic in the way it is written, and I beleive that some of the sections ...
2011-12-15
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-15
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I do, of course, support the development of a P2P streaming protocol, and I think it will be good for the industry. It ...
2011-12-15
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-14
07 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) in section 4, there is a discussion of pull-based versus push-based. The discussion talks about the benefits of pull-based (but not the ...
2011-12-14
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-14
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Section 4 says that you can have pull, push or a hybrid but does
say if the PPSP wg is going to ...
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Section 4 says that you can have pull, push or a hybrid but does
say if the PPSP wg is going to ...
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(Discuss discuss, for the IESG really I guess)
How does this all fit with decade and cdni?  Are we heading towards a good ...
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-13
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-13
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I like that "chunk" is a unit of "block" with sub-unit "piece". What
is "block"? :-)

---

The definition of CDN in section ...
2011-12-13
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
As it stands, I'm affraid I don't see much value in this document.
Although it is probably harmless and the usecases may provide ...
2011-12-13
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-13
07 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
It's not obvious how this document is going to help the working group with it's protocol work, or help document the work once ...
2011-12-13
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-12
07 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
Please consider the comments provided in the Gen-ART Review by
  Francis Dupont on 24-Nov-2011.  The review can be found here:
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06935.html
2011-12-12
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-12
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
There is a fine line between providing evidence for a case to design something and delivering a commercial message. Unfortunately, even though the ...
2011-12-12
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-07
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-12-05
07 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
The first three paragraphs of the Introduction are mostly marketing and deserve to be deleted.

"In this document we propose an open P2P ...
2011-12-05
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-01
07 Wesley Eddy State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-12-01
07 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2011-12-01
07 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2011-12-01
07 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2011-11-30
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-11-29
07 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-11-29
07 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-15
2011-11-28
07 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2011-11-24
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2011-11-24
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2011-11-17
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-11-17
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-11-16
07 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-11-16
07 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-11-16
07 Wesley Eddy Last Call was requested
2011-11-16
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-11-16
07 (System) Last call text was added
2011-11-16
07 Wesley Eddy State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-11-15
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-11-15
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-07.txt
2011-11-03
07 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-11-03
07 Wesley Eddy
Hi; this is a big improvement and you pretty much addressed all my comments, but there are
still a few very minor clean-ups that I ...
2011-10-30
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-06.txt
2011-10-17
07 Wesley Eddy
State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
I've completed AD review of this document, and while the content is complete, I don't ...
2011-10-09
07 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-10-07
07 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does he ...
2011-10-07
07 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-10-07
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Martin Stiemerling (martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-09-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-05.txt
2011-09-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-04.txt
2011-08-12
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-03.txt
2011-07-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-02.txt
2011-01-16
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-01.txt
2010-10-18
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ppsp-problem-statement-00.txt