Framework for Loop-Free Convergence Using the Ordered Forwarding Information Base (oFIB) Approach
RFC 6976

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Comment (2013-01-31 for -09)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing Dan's review comments

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2013-02-07 for -09)
No email
send info
-

the mechanism -> the mechanisms

- 
   It is assumed in the description that follows that all routers in the
   routing domain are oFIB capable.  This can be verified in an
   operation network by the routers reporting oFIB capability using the
   IGP in use.  Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used. 

I guess you mean
   Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used in all routers.

Otherwise, it contradicts the first sentence

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

Comment (2013-02-06 for -09)
No email
send info
It seems interesting, but I'm confused why if it works so well in simulations, that nobody seems interested in going further with this.  What's the value of an IETF RFC versus other types of publication, given that there's IPR attached to this as an Informational document?  It's clearly informative, but I get the feeling that there's more information that must not be clear in the writing at the moment about what the ultimate goal is.

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Comment (2013-02-05 for -09)
No email
send info
I find the rationale in the write-up for publishing this document "interesting".

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Pete Resnick) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

Comment (2013-02-06 for -09)
No email
send info
Please see my comment on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses. It applies equally to this document.

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2013-02-05 for -09)
No email
send info
I am balloting No Objection based on my unenlightened read and the support of the Sponsoring AD.

(Stewart Bryant) Recuse