Skip to main content

Framework for Loop-Free Convergence Using the Ordered Forwarding Information Base (oFIB) Approach
RFC 6976

Yes


No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)

Recuse

(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes (2013-01-31 for -09)
Thanks for addressing Dan's review comments

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -08)

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2013-02-07 for -09)
-

the mechanism -> the mechanisms

- 
   It is assumed in the description that follows that all routers in the
   routing domain are oFIB capable.  This can be verified in an
   operation network by the routers reporting oFIB capability using the
   IGP in use.  Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used. 

I guess you mean
   Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used in all routers.

Otherwise, it contradicts the first sentence

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-02-05 for -09)
I find the rationale in the write-up for publishing this document "interesting".

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-02-06 for -09)
Please see my comment on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses. It applies equally to this document.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-02-05 for -09)
I am balloting No Objection based on my unenlightened read and the support of the Sponsoring AD.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -09)

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-02-06 for -09)
It seems interesting, but I'm confused why if it works so well in simulations, that nobody seems interested in going further with this.  What's the value of an IETF RFC versus other types of publication, given that there's IPR attached to this as an Informational document?  It's clearly informative, but I get the feeling that there's more information that must not be clear in the writing at the moment about what the ultimate goal is.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse (for -08)