Skip to main content

Framework for Loop-Free Convergence Using the Ordered Forwarding Information Base (oFIB) Approach
RFC 6976

Yes


No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)

Recuse

(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Yes (2013-01-31 for -09) Unknown
Thanks for addressing Dan's review comments
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2013-02-07 for -09) Unknown
-

the mechanism -> the mechanisms

- 
   It is assumed in the description that follows that all routers in the
   routing domain are oFIB capable.  This can be verified in an
   operation network by the routers reporting oFIB capability using the
   IGP in use.  Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used. 

I guess you mean
   Where non-oFIB capable routers exist in the network,
   normal convergence would be used in all routers.

Otherwise, it contradicts the first sentence
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-02-05 for -09) Unknown
I find the rationale in the write-up for publishing this document "interesting".
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-02-06 for -09) Unknown
Please see my comment on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses. It applies equally to this document.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-02-05 for -09) Unknown
I am balloting No Objection based on my unenlightened read and the support of the Sponsoring AD.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -09) Unknown

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-02-06 for -09) Unknown
It seems interesting, but I'm confused why if it works so well in simulations, that nobody seems interested in going further with this.  What's the value of an IETF RFC versus other types of publication, given that there's IPR attached to this as an Informational document?  It's clearly informative, but I get the feeling that there's more information that must not be clear in the writing at the moment about what the ultimate goal is.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse (for -08) Unknown