Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options
RFC 6994

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options@ietf.org to (None)
2013-08-09
06 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC6994
2013-08-08
06 (System) RFC published
2013-08-06
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-08-05
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-07-11
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-06-18
06 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-06-18
06 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-06-18
06 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-06-18
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-06-17
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2013-06-17
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2013-06-14
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-06-14
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2013-06-14
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-06-12
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-06-12
06 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-06-12
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-06-12
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-06-12
06 Martin Stiemerling Ballot approval text was changed
2013-06-12
06 Martin Stiemerling Ballot writeup was changed
2013-06-12
06 Martin Stiemerling State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-06-10
06 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
Based on the recent update to the document, I'm moving this to a No Objection.  I don't really think that ...
2013-06-10
06 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-06-04
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-06-04
06 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-06.txt
2013-06-03
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2013-05-16
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I have not decided whether to recommend the publication of this document yet. I want to hear the discussion on the IESG telechat ...
2013-05-16
05 Jari Arkko Ballot comment text updated for Jari Arkko
2013-05-15
05 Spencer Dawkins Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins
2013-05-15
05 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
A quick roll through the narrative minutes from 2012-12-20 make it look like the previous IESG has had a rollicking good time with ...
2013-05-15
05 Spencer Dawkins Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins
2013-05-15
05 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
A quick roll through the narrative minutes from 2012-12-20 make it look like the previous IESG has had a rollicking good time with ...
2013-05-15
05 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-05-15
05 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-05-15
05 Martin Stiemerling needs a revised draft to address at least one of the ballot positions.
2013-05-15
05 Martin Stiemerling State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-05-14
05 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
This is a significant improvement over the version that I previously reviewed.

Although significant steps have been taken to improve the document, the ...
2013-05-14
05 Stewart Bryant Ballot comment text updated for Stewart Bryant
2013-05-13
05 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-05-12
05 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
I don't think it adds value to have the ExID be of variable length.  It's highly implausible that there could ...
2013-05-12
05 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-05-06
05 Martin Stiemerling Telechat date has been changed to 2013-05-16 from 2013-05-30
2013-04-26
05 Martin Stiemerling Telechat date has been changed to 2013-05-30 from 2012-12-20
2013-04-26
05 Martin Stiemerling The draft has been improved and requires more ballot positions, due to the change in the IESG in March 2013.
2013-04-26
05 Martin Stiemerling State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-04-26
05 Martin Stiemerling Document shepherd changed to Michael Scharf
2013-03-18
05 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot comment]
In light of the more recent drafts, I'm fine with logging my position as no objection.

I'm not sure that I ...
2013-03-18
05 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-03-18
05 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Hi Joe,

Thanks for your effort on this draft.
I'll clear my DISCUSS now.
The draft improved a lot during our discussion ...
2013-03-18
05 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-03-13
05 Cindy Morgan Shepherding AD changed to Martin Stiemerling
2013-03-13
05 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-05.txt
2013-02-28
04 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for working on my previous DISCUSS. The draft goes in the right direction IMHO.
I still find the draft confusing in three ...
2013-02-28
04 Benoît Claise Ballot discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2013-02-28
04 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for working on my previous DISCUSS. The draft goes in the right direction IMHO.
I still find the draft confusing in three ...
2013-02-28
04 Benoît Claise Ballot discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2013-02-25
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
I think the changes in -04 are a fine compromise, providing an FCFS registry for those willing to use it, and giving advice ...
2013-02-25
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-02-25
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-02-25
04 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-04.txt
2013-02-18
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Based on the discussion of my objection to this document, I am moving to Abstain before stepping down as Int AD.
2013-02-18
03 Ralph Droms Ballot comment text updated for Ralph Droms
2013-02-18
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2012-12-20
03 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-12-20
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Carl Wallace.
2012-12-20
03 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
Updated after some discussion, including response from the authors:

I don't understand why an IANA-administered First Come First Served [RFC5226}
registry for ...
2012-12-20
03 Barry Leiba Ballot discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-12-20
03 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
Given the discussions during the IESG call, I am moving to Abstain.
2012-12-20
03 Brian Haberman Ballot comment text updated for Brian Haberman
2012-12-20
03 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2012-12-20
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
I am convinced by the IESG discussion that this is not appropriate for a standards track document.
2012-12-20
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to Abstain from No Objection
2012-12-20
03 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-12-20
03 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-12-20
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Also from DHCP: RFC 3925, which uses enterprise numbers to disambiguate a shared DHCP option code.  Has the use of enterprise numbers ...
2012-12-20
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-12-19
03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Reading the draft, my first reaction was: "you're not solving anything since you might still have collisions".
As I don't want ...
2012-12-19
03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-12-19
03 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
I don't understand why an IANA-administered First Come First Served [RFC5226} registry for magic numbers isn't preferable to an ad hoc ...
2012-12-19
03 Barry Leiba Ballot discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-12-19
03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-12-19
03 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-12-19
03 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I have concerns that we are standardizing a sub-optimal approach based on the assumption of non-collision of identifiers, when it seems likely that ...
2012-12-19
03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to Abstain from No Objection
2012-12-18
03 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
I don't understand why an IANA-administered First Come First Served [RFC5226} registry for magic numbers isn't preferable to an ad hoc ...
2012-12-18
03 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-12-18
03 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Note that you have 3692 transposed as 3962! I find this symptomatic :-(

---

I am Abstaining on this document.  I understand it as ...
2012-12-18
03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-12-18
03 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I am surprised that the "magic number" is not defined to be an OUI + (char)Type , if necessary on a newly allocated option ...
2012-12-18
03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-12-17
03 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
I may be missing something obvious here, but I am sure someone will set me straight if I am...

How can the size ...
2012-12-17
03 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-12-17
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-12-17
03 Christer Holmberg Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Christer Holmberg.
2012-12-17
03 Christer Holmberg Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Christer Holmberg.
2012-12-17
03 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-12-17
03 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- typo @ end p2: "and in are"

- section 5, the last "MUST NOT" is a bit surprising - what if
the experimental option were turned ...
2012-12-17
03 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-12-17
03 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-12-15
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-12-13
03 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-12-11
03 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-03, which is
currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-12-04
03 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2012-12-04
03 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-12-04
03 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2012-12-04
03 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was changed
2012-11-29
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-11-29
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Christer Holmberg
2012-11-29
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace
2012-11-29
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace
2012-11-29
03 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <tcpm@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2012-11-29
03 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-11-29
03 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-12-20
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy Last call was requested
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy Last call announcement was generated
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy Ballot approval text was generated
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup was generated
2012-11-28
03 Wesley Eddy State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-11-28
03 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-03.txt
2012-11-08
02 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-11-08
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2012-11-08
02 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?  Why
is this the proper type of ...
2012-11-08
02 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Michael Scharf (michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-10-05
02 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-02.txt
2012-05-30
01 Joseph Touch New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-01.txt
2012-03-07
00 Wesley Eddy Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-03-07
00 Wesley Eddy IESG process started in state AD is watching
2012-01-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options-00.txt