Skip to main content

Miscellaneous Capabilities Negotiation in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
RFC 7006

Yes

(Gonzalo Camarillo)

No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -06)

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2013-06-21 for -06)
I was able to guess at bcap and ccap, but not at icap (title), and I had to scan for a while to decode that. The 4th occurrence of "title" finally said "*media* title" capability - that helped. 

Could you consider moving "media title" to the first occurrence of "title" in the doc?

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-06-27 for -06)
I think it would be helpful to add a reminder of how legacy
implementations and those that do not support the new capability 
negotiations will react when they are attempted. This is probably just
a simple one line statement and a reference.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-06-21 for -06)
As I read the internationalization paragraph in Section 3.1.3, I find that I would appreciate an example that shows two titles for the same content, in different character sets.  Can you add such an example?

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-06-26 for -06)
Are these possibly missing security considerations?

- The bandwidth capability could be used as part of
a DoS if reservations are made based on bad values.
For example, if Alice gets lots of bandwidth reserved
then Bob might not be able to do stuff.

- A premium-rate number could be included in the 
PSTN thingy.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)

                            

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -06)