Using LDP Multipoint Extensions on Targeted LDP Sessions
RFC 7060
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
I see Section 1.3 manageability in RFC 6388. Good. Please add a sentence/a new section such as this one: Section 1.3 "manageability" in RFC 6388 stresses the need to develop an additional MIB module, next to RFC3815, to support P2MP in LDP. LDP multipoint extension for targeted LDP should also be covered by this MIB module.
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
- The write-up says an implementation poll was sent out and results would be in "soon" - are they in? - The security considerations just says "nothing new here" which is always a bit offputting for a SEC AD:-) Can you explain why there is nothing new here? (I didn't have time to trace all the references sorry, and I'm not asking that you put in new text but do wonder if there's an easy answer to the question.)