Skip to main content

Using LDP Multipoint Extensions on Targeted LDP Sessions
RFC 7060

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)
(Stewart Bryant)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-09-11)
I see Section 1.3 manageability in RFC 6388. Good.
Please add a sentence/a new section such as this one:

    Section 1.3 "manageability" in RFC 6388 stresses the need to develop an additional MIB module, next to RFC3815, 
    to support P2MP in LDP.  LDP multipoint extension for targeted LDP should also be covered by this MIB module.

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-09-12)
- The write-up says an implementation poll was sent out
and results would be in "soon" - are they in?

- The security considerations just says "nothing new here"
which is always a bit offputting for a SEC AD:-) Can you
explain why there is nothing new here? (I didn't have time
to trace all the references sorry, and I'm not asking that
you put in new text but do wonder if there's an easy
answer to the question.)