Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers
RFC 7065
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Pete's comments about the ABNF, and share his dismay that these documents copy significant bits of standard ABNF productions from the URI document. I think that's a Bad Idea. Comment for the document shepherd: Thanks for a good, useful writeup!
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Pete's observation about restating ABNF in this document.
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
[3.1: ABNF changed to reference 3986] 3.2: I suggest changing "MUST be" to "is" in both cases. The MUSTs are gratuitous. Then get rid of the reference to 2119. It's unnecessary.
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
1. Introduction [RFC5928] defines a resolution mechanism to convert a secure flag, a host name or IP address, an eventually empty port, and an eventually empty transport to a list of IP address, port, and TURN transport tuples. I'm not understanding the use of "eventually empty" in this paragraph, and that's not a term I saw in [RFC5928]. Is it familiar to those skilled in the art of TURN?
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for handling my discuss and comments.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection
In 3.1, last paragraph: The <host>, <port> and <transport> components are passed without The ABNF says turn-host and turn-port, not host and port. This is not a major nit, but it would be good to be consistent here. This inconsistency is repeated further in the document.