An Architecture for Reputation Reporting
RFC 7070

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
10 (System) Changed document authors from "Murray Kucherawy, Nathaniel Borenstein, Andrew Sullivan" to "Murray Kucherawy, Nathaniel Borenstein"
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from repute-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-repute-model@ietf.org to (None)
2013-11-22
10 (System) RFC published
2013-11-19
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-11-15
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-10-29
10 Roni Even Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Roni Even.
2013-10-18
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-09-30
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2013-09-30
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2013-09-30
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-09-30
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-09-30
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-09-30
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-09-30
10 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-09-30
10 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-09-30
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-09-30
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-09-30
10 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-09-28
10 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-09-17
10 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-09-17
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.

Editorial: expand the acronyms in figure 1
2013-09-17
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-09-17
10 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-10.txt
2013-09-16
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Thanks for making the changes for my discuss. Your new
text says:

"For interchanges that are sensitive to such exposures, it is
imperative ...
2013-09-16
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-09-12
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-09-12
09 Murray Kucherawy IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2013-09-12
09 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-09.txt
2013-09-12
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-09-12
08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-09-11
08 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I welcome the inclusion of a Privacy Considerations section, but I wonder whether it goes far enough.

In Section 2 you observe:
  ...
2013-09-11
08 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-09-11
08 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-09-11
08 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I support Stephen's discuss position.

Figure 1: There can be more than one author of an email message, so should figure 1 indicate ...
2013-09-11
08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-09-11
08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-09-10
08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
Clearing the following DISCUSS on the basis of Murray Kucherawy's proposal:

Section 4.1 appears to be confusing two different things by referring to ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.1 appears to be confusing two different things by referring to them with the same term: "response set."  I think a response ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon Ballot discuss text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.1 appears to be confusing two different things by referring to them with the same term: "response set."  I think a response ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon Ballot discuss text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.1 appears to be confusing two different things by referring to them with the same term: "response set."  I think a response ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon Ballot discuss text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.1 appears to be confusing two different things by referring to them with the same term: "response set."  I think a response ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The box around the DKIM signer and validator in figure 1 is a bit confusing.  Is it really necessary?  I know the technology ...
2013-09-10
08 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-09-10
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

8.1 says it is "imperative" to protect sensitive information
in transit. I have no idea how DNS is a suitable transport for
that ...
2013-09-10
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- intro: "community or the Internet public generally" is
misleading to the point of being plain wrong. There is
afaik no concept that ...
2013-09-10
08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-09-10
08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-09-10
08 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
Non-blocking... I agree with Joel's assessment that there are some missing pieces to this document series.
2013-09-10
08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-09-10
08 Pete Resnick State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-09-10
08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-09-10)
2013-09-09
08 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
1. The notion of application is not clear, and lead to some ambiguities.

Example 1:
OLD: IANA registries are created in a separate ...
2013-09-09
08 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Editorial: expand the acronyms in figure 1

As OPS AD, this one makes me happy, even if I still have to read the ...
2013-09-09
08 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-09-09
08 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-09-09
08 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot comment]
this is non-blocking...

Manageability considerations for a reputation system? addition/state change/determination of state change.

I can imagine a number of things that I ...
2013-09-09
08 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-09-07
08 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-09-07
08 Pete Resnick Ballot has been issued
2013-09-07
08 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-09-07
08 Pete Resnick Created "Approve" ballot
2013-09-07
08 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2013-09-05
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-09-05
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-09-05
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Donald Eastlake.
2013-09-04
08 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2013-09-04
08 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-repute-model-08, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We have a comment about this document.

We ...
2013-08-29
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-08-29
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-08-27
08 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <domainrep@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt> ...
2013-08-27
08 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from In Last Call
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was changed
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Informational
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-27
08 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-27
08 Murray Kucherawy IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2013-08-27
08 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt
2013-08-20
07 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-08-20
07 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-repute-model-07, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any ...
2013-08-18
07 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-09-12
2013-08-16
07 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2013-08-16
07 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2013-08-15
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-08-15
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2013-08-15
07 Cindy Morgan IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-08-15
07 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <domainrep@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> ...
2013-08-15
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Intended Status changed to Informational from None
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-15
07 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-07-12
07 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2013-07-12
07 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was generated
2013-07-12
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-07-12
07 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt
2013-07-12
06 Pete Resnick
Discussed with author (MK) - Update to this and to http-query document to make clear that the two-stage nature of the query is http specific, ...
2013-07-12
06 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-07-04
06 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-07-03
06 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-06.txt
2013-06-06
05 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-05.txt
2013-05-25
04 Pete Resnick Waiting for reply from authors/shepherds.
2013-05-25
04 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed from AD Evaluation
2013-05-25
04 Pete Resnick Changed document writeup
2013-05-20
04 Pete Resnick Misunderstood chair. This document is ready for publication. Going ahead with AD Evaluation.
2013-05-20
04 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::External Party
2013-05-20
04 Pete Resnick Waiting for go-ahead from chair.
2013-05-20
04 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation
2013-03-21
04 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2013-03-04
04 Stephanie McCammon New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-04.txt
2013-02-25
03 Pete Resnick State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2013-02-25
03 Dave Crocker Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway cleared.
2013-02-25
03 Dave Crocker Changed protocol writeup
2013-02-25
03 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call
2013-02-25
03 Dave Crocker Changed shepherd to DCrocker
2012-11-13
03 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-03.txt
2012-11-09
02 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2012-06-15
02 Andrew Sullivan New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-02.txt
2012-03-05
01 Andrew Sullivan New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-01.txt
2011-12-16
00 Dave Crocker discussed at ietf82; room consensus. no objection on mailing list, when queried.
2011-12-16
00 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to WG Document from Adopted by a WG
2011-12-16
00 Dave Crocker discussed at ietf82; room consensus. no objection on mailing list, when queried.
2011-12-16
00 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to Adopted by a WG from Call For Adoption By WG Issued
2011-12-16
00 Pete Resnick Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-11-29
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-repute-model-00.txt