A Reputation Query Protocol
RFC 7072

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from repute-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-repute-query-http@ietf.org to (None)
2013-11-22
11 (System) RFC published
2013-11-19
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-11-15
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-10-23
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF
2013-10-23
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to REF from EDIT
2013-09-30
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from MISSREF
2013-09-30
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2013-09-30
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2013-09-30
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-09-30
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-09-30
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-09-30
11 (System) RFC Editor state changed to MISSREF
2013-09-30
11 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-09-30
11 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-09-30
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-09-30
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-09-30
11 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-09-28
11 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-09-13
11 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-09-12
11 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The comment points listed below have been addressed.  Thanks for working with me on this!

Relating to DISCUSS item 2, I think ...
2013-09-12
11 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-09-12
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-09-12
11 Murray Kucherawy IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2013-09-12
11 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-11.txt
2013-09-12
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-09-12
10 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] Position for Richard Barnes has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-09-12
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-09-12
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-09-11
10 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-09-11
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I support the Discusses and Comments relating to Security. Notwithstanding the reference to the Considerations document, this document should strengthen the use of ...
2013-09-11
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-09-11
10 Richard Barnes
[Ballot discuss]
The Introduction says "The mechanism is a two-stage query", but the first stage is never defined.  (That is, how the client gets ...
2013-09-11
10 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-09-11
10 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Ted's position.
2013-09-11
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-09-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
1. Underspecified security considerations:

  The security considerations section says:

    In particular, the basic protocol used for
    this service ...
2013-09-11
10 Ted Lemon Ballot discuss text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-09-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
1. Underspecified security considerations:

  The security considerations section says:

    In particular, the basic protocol used for
    this service ...
2013-09-11
10 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
Relating to DISCUSS item 2, I think the only reason to give multiple templates is to address the optional "assertion" variable.  If ...
2013-09-11
10 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-09-11
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-09-10
10 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
  Clients SHOULD NOT repeat the query prior to the timestamp in the
  Expires field, or wait no less than one day ...
2013-09-10
10 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-09-10
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- I assume 6570 defines the syntax that "application",
"service", "subject" and "assertion" have to follow and says
if any percent encoding is needed ...
2013-09-10
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-09-10
10 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-09-09
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot comment]
See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/ballot/#benoit-claise
2013-09-09
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-09-09
10 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2013-09-09
10 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-09-07
10 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-09-07
10 Pete Resnick State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-09-07
10 Pete Resnick Ballot has been issued
2013-09-07
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-09-07
10 Pete Resnick Created "Approve" ballot
2013-09-07
10 Pete Resnick Note added 'Suggest reading -model first.'
2013-09-06
10 Meral Shirazipour Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2013-09-05
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-08-29
10 Meral Shirazipour Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour.
2013-08-29
10 Murray Kucherawy IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2013-08-29
10 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-10.txt
2013-08-29
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-08-22
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Shawn Emery.
2013-08-21
09 Cindy Morgan Note field has been cleared
2013-08-20
09 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-08-20
09 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.  Authors should review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond ...
2013-08-18
09 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-09-12
2013-08-16
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2013-08-15
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour
2013-08-15
09 Cindy Morgan IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-08-15
09 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <domainrep@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2013-08-15
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-08-15
09 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2013-08-15
09 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2013-08-15
09 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-08-15
09 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-08-15
09 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2013-07-12
09 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2013-07-12
09 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was generated
2013-07-12
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-07-12
09 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt
2013-07-12
08 Pete Resnick
Discussed with author (MK) - Update to this and to model document to make clear that the two-stage nature of the query is http specific, not ...
2013-07-12
08 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-07-04
08 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-07-03
08 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-08.txt
2013-06-06
07 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-07.txt
2013-05-25
06 Pete Resnick Waiting for reply from authors/shepherds.
2013-05-25
06 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed from AD Evaluation
2013-05-25
06 Pete Resnick Changed document writeup
2013-05-25
06 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2013-05-20
06 Dave Crocker IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from Call For Adoption By WG Issued
2013-05-20
06 Amy Vezza
> == Document Writeup ==

> === 1. Summary ===
>
> Who is the document shepherd?

  D. Crocker

> Who is the responsible Area Director?

  P ...
2013-05-20
06 Amy Vezza Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2013-05-20
06 Amy Vezza State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2013-05-20
06 Amy Vezza Note added 'D. Crocker (dcrocker@bbiw.net) is the document shepherd.'
2013-05-20
06 Dave Crocker IETF WG state changed to Call For Adoption By WG Issued from Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-05-20
06 Dave Crocker IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call
2013-05-17
06 Dave Crocker Changed document writeup
2013-05-16
06 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-06.txt
2013-05-05
05 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-05.txt
2013-02-26
04 Dave Crocker Changed shepherd to DCrocker
2012-11-13
04 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-04.txt
2012-11-09
03 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2012-06-28
03 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-03.txt
2012-04-06
02 Murray Kucherawy New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-02.txt
2012-01-13
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-01.txt
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker discussed at ietf82; room consensus. no objection on mailing list, when queried.
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to WG Document from Adopted by a WG
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker discussed at ietf82; room consensus. no objection on mailing list, when queried.
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to Adopted by a WG from Adopted by a WG
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker discussed at ietf82; room consensus. no objection on mailing list, when queried.
2011-12-16
01 Dave Crocker IETF state changed to Adopted by a WG from Call For Adoption By WG Issued
2011-12-16
01 Pete Resnick Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-11-20
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-00.txt