The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
RFC 7079
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
A good piece of work, thank you. I am a little disappointed that there are no conclusions about what can safely be deprecated and what could be made Historic. But perhaps the WG will pick that out of the survey and work on it.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
I understand this is just survey but could we start asking questions about whether the MTI security mechanisms are actually implemented. Were there some PWs where no security was implemented?
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection