The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
RFC 7079
Yes
(Stewart Bryant)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-10-08)
Unknown
A good piece of work, thank you. I am a little disappointed that there are no conclusions about what can safely be deprecated and what could be made Historic. But perhaps the WG will pick that out of the survey and work on it.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-10-07)
Unknown
I understand this is just survey but could we start asking questions about whether the MTI security mechanisms are actually implemented. Were there some PWs where no security was implemented?
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown