The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results
RFC 7079

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

Comment (2013-10-08)
No email
send info
A good piece of work, thank you.

I am a little disappointed that there are no conclusions about what can safely be deprecated and what could be made Historic. But perhaps the WG will pick that out of the survey and work on it.

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2013-10-07)
No email
send info
I understand this is just survey but could we start asking questions about whether the MTI security mechanisms are actually implemented.  Were there some PWs where no security was implemented?