Skip to main content

Object Identifier Registry for the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group
RFC 7107

Yes

(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Ted Lemon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -00)

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (for -00)

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2013-11-18 for -00)
Just minor suggestions, feel free to ignore:

- General: Maybe say that changing these OIDs would
have a bad effect on interop, since there are some
folks who don't seem to get that?

- section 3: Do you mean the expert should only
accept stuff that'd have been ok with some historical
charter for the smime wg? "Strongly related" seems
somewhat vague. Given the very broad range of
existing OIDs, what would not fit? Would some more
guidance help the expert?

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-11-20 for -00)
I have no objection but I note that according to 5226:
            The required documentation and review
            criteria for use by the Designated Expert should be provided
            when defining the registry.
This document gives the review criteria (thanks) but is silent on "documentation". Possibly silence means no documentation is needed, but it would be nice to make that explicit.

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2013-11-21 for -00)
There is, however, a good comment from Suresh Krishnan on his Gen-ART review. Please make sure it is handled before we pass the document to the RFC Editor.

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)

                            

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (for -00)