High Availability within a Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Network Element
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Richard Barnes) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2013-12-05 for -09)
This might be part of Sean's discuss in which case I'll clear and it'll be resolved there, but what is meant in the security considerations where it says that "CEs should use secure communication channels"? Some mail reveals the vendors do proprietary things with various nice names. It might or might not be worth adding a little description about that to the draft.
(Brian Haberman) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
Comment (2013-12-03 for -09)
09 addressed the ops-dir review issues.