High Availability within a Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Network Element
RFC 7121

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2013-12-05 for -09)
No email
send info
This might be part of Sean's discuss in which case I'll
clear and it'll be resolved there, but what is meant in
the security considerations where it says that "CEs should
use secure communication channels"?

Some mail reveals the vendors do proprietary things
with various nice names. It might or might not be worth
adding a little description about that to the draft.

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2013-12-03 for -09)
No email
send info
09 addressed the ops-dir review issues.

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) No Objection