Recommendations on Filtering of IPv4 Packets Containing IPv4 Options
RFC 7126

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from opsec-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering@ietf.org to (None)
2014-02-10
07 (System) RFC published
2014-02-04
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2014-01-27
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2014-01-27
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-12-17
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-12-16
07 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-12-16
07 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-12-16
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2013-12-16
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-12-16
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-12-16
07 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2013-12-16
07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-12-16
07 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2013-12-14
07 Joel Jaeggli
07 addressed outstanding lc comments with some minor text changes. I have personally reviewed them and do not believe that the iesg does not need ...
2013-12-14
07 Joel Jaeggli State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-12-09
07 Carlos Pignataro New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-07.txt
2013-12-03
06 Suresh Krishnan Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Almost Ready. Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan.
2013-12-01
06 Joel Jaeggli looks good, waiting for loop to be closed with last call review.
2013-11-28
06 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Telechat review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response'
2013-11-28
06 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Telechat review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2013-11-22
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]

Thanks for handling my discuss and educating me
on IPv4 options!
2013-11-22
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-11-22
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-11-22
06 Carlos Pignataro IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2013-11-22
06 Carlos Pignataro New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-06.txt
2013-11-21
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-11-21
05 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-11-21
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-11-21
05 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
I wish we produced docs like this more often. Thanks for working on it.

I agree with Pete that the 2119 language seems ...
2013-11-21
05 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-11-21
05 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
From a purely historical point of view I think that the following is a
little late:

"From about 1995 onwards, a growing number ...
2013-11-21
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-11-21
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-11-21
05 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
  We also note that while this document provides advice on dropping
  packets on a "per IP option type", not all devices ...
2013-11-21
05 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-11-20
05 Ted Lemon [Ballot comment]
This is a great document.  Thanks for working on it!
2013-11-20
05 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-11-20
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

So I'm not sure if this really needs fixing but 4.23.1
notes that RFCs 1122 and 1812 say you MUST ...
2013-11-20
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- 4.12 and 4.13 seem to have a lot of duplicated
text so it wasn't clear to me how they differed ...
2013-11-20
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-11-19
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for this document. I support its publication.

---

I agree with Pete that the value of using RFC 2119 language in the
"Advice ...
2013-11-19
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-11-19
05 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-11-18
05 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
A question: Are router vendors already adopting these recommendations? If not, are we sure they're going to? That is, is this document ...
2013-11-18
05 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-11-18
05 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
This is a useful piece of work.  I only have two nit-like comments that you can take or leave...

1. The end ...
2013-11-18
05 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-11-15
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
One small editorial comment:

-- Section 4.3 --

  RFC 791 states that this option should appear, at most, once in a
  given ...
2013-11-15
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-11-15
05 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Benson Schliesser
2013-11-03
05 Joel Jaeggli Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-11-21
2013-10-31
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to David Waltermire
2013-10-25
05 Tero Kivinen Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Sam Weiler was rejected
2013-10-05
05 Joel Jaeggli State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2013-10-03
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot has been issued
2013-10-03
05 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-10-03
05 Joel Jaeggli Created "Approve" ballot
2013-10-03
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot writeup was changed
2013-09-30
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call (ends 2013-09-30)
2013-09-24
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-09-24
05 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn ...
2013-09-19
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Suresh Krishnan
2013-09-19
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler
2013-09-16
05 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-09-16
05 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <opsec@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2013-09-16
05 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli Last call was requested
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli Last call announcement was generated
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot approval text was generated
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot writeup was generated
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli reviewed revised draft.
2013-09-16
05 Joel Jaeggli State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-09-16
05 Carlos Pignataro New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt
2013-09-03
04 Joel Jaeggli
some thoughts from my review.

1. I'm not sure sure we should be getting all the alarms from the NITs on the table in ...
2013-09-03
04 Joel Jaeggli State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation
2013-09-03
04 Joel Jaeggli State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2013-08-22
04 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2013-08-22
04 Cindy Morgan Changed document writeup
2013-08-22
04 Joel Jaeggli Intended Status changed to Best Current Practice
2013-08-22
04 Joel Jaeggli IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2013-08-22
04 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for /doc/draft-gont-opsec-ip-options-filtering/
2013-08-22
04 Chittimaneni Kk Document shepherd changed to KK Chittimaneni
2013-08-22
04 Chittimaneni Kk Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2013-08-22
04 Chittimaneni Kk
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2013-08-22
04 Chittimaneni Kk IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2013-07-14
04 Warren Kumari IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2013-07-11
04 Carlos Pignataro New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-04.txt
2013-07-09
03 Carlos Pignataro New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-03.txt
2013-02-18
02 Warren Kumari IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2013-01-26
02 Fernando Gont New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-02.txt
2012-12-13
01 Fernando Gont New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-01.txt
2012-06-11
00 Fernando Gont New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-00.txt