Use of the OSPF-MANET Interface in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks
RFC 7137
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
Thanks for the clear explanation of what you're doing and why -- it made it very easy to review this document.
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Barry's compliment. Easy to understand. As a comment - I'm looking at this text: 3. Single-Hop Network Operation The operation of the MANET interface doesn't change when implemented on a single-hop broadcast interface. However, the operation of some of the proposed enhancements can be simplified. Explicitly, the Overlapping Relay Discovery Process SHOULD NOT be executed and the A-bit SHOULD NOT be set by any of the nodes: the result is an empty set of Active Overlapping Relays. Are these SHOULD NOT 2119 keywords required for interoperability? The paragraph looks more like a statement saying "if you don't do these things, the result is an empty set of Active Overlapping Relays, and that simplifies operation". You might consider that, along with any other comments you receive.
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection