Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Adjacency
RFC 7177
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
I couldn't find a clear statement of what parts of RFC 6325 are being updated. Is the intention of the "updates" metadata and the text that says: In case of conflict between this document and [RFC6325], this document prevails. ...just in case this document creates a conflict with 6325? I would prefer that "updates" was used to reflect a deliberate and conscious change, and that such a change was called out.
(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection
(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Former DISCUSS text for the record: I agree with Adrian's concern to the point where I am raising this to a DISCUSS. The document currently contains an appendix that describes the differences between this document and 6327 but not a section that describes what is being updated from 6325. In response to Adrian's comment, the authors said that it is possible they created a conflict and just wanted to force readers of 6325 to read 6327bis. *If* 6327bis is updating 6325, it should clearly spell out how it relates to 6325. Adding a section similar to the appendix describing the changes from 6327 should suffice. Another outcome would be that the authors discover that there is not an Updates relationship and the meta-tag is dropped.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with the concerns expressed by Brian and Adrian.