Skip to main content

Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Adjacency
RFC 7177

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from trill-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis@ietf.org to (None)
2014-05-07
04 (System) RFC published
2014-05-05
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7177">AUTH48-DONE</a> from AUTH48
2014-04-14
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7177">AUTH48</a> from RFC-EDITOR
2014-04-07
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF
2014-03-27
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to REF from AUTH
2014-03-26
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from EDIT
2014-02-03
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from MISSREF
2014-01-30
04 Elwyn Davies Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Elwyn Davies.
2014-01-17
04 Gunter Van de Velde Closed request for Last Call review by OPSDIR with state 'No Response'
2014-01-16
04 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2014-01-15
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2014-01-14
04 (System) RFC Editor state changed to MISSREF
2014-01-14
04 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2014-01-13
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2014-01-13
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2014-01-13
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2014-01-13
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2014-01-13
04 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2014-01-13
04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2014-01-11
04 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
Former DISCUSS text for the record:

I agree with Adrian's concern to the point where I am raising this to a DISCUSS.  The …
[Ballot comment]
Former DISCUSS text for the record:

I agree with Adrian's concern to the point where I am raising this to a DISCUSS.  The document currently contains an appendix that describes the differences between this document and 6327 but not a section that describes what is being updated from 6325.  In response to Adrian's comment, the authors said that it is possible they created a conflict and just wanted to force readers of 6325 to read 6327bis.  *If* 6327bis is updating 6325, it should clearly spell out how it relates to 6325.  Adding a section similar to the appendix describing the changes from 6327 should suffice.  Another outcome would be that the authors discover that there is not an Updates relationship and the meta-tag is dropped.
2014-01-11
04 Brian Haberman Ballot comment text updated for Brian Haberman
2014-01-11
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-01-10
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2014-01-10
04 Donald Eastlake IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-01-10
04 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-04.txt
2014-01-09
03 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2014-01-09
03 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2014-01-09
03 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2014-01-09
03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2014-01-08
03 Amanda Baber IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2014-01-08
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-01-08
03 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Adrian's concern to the point where I am raising this to a DISCUSS.  The document currently contains an appendix that …
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Adrian's concern to the point where I am raising this to a DISCUSS.  The document currently contains an appendix that describes the differences between this document and 6327 but not a section that describes what is being updated from 6325.  In response to Adrian's comment, the authors said that it is possible they created a conflict and just wanted to force readers of 6325 to read 6327bis.  *If* 6327bis is updating 6325, it should clearly spell out how it relates to 6325.  Adding a section similar to the appendix describing the changes from 6327 should suffice.  Another outcome would be that the authors discover that there is not an Updates relationship and the meta-tag is dropped.
2014-01-08
03 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2014-01-08
03 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-01-08
03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I agree with the concerns expressed by Brian and Adrian.
2014-01-08
03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2014-01-08
03 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2014-01-08
03 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2014-01-07
03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-01-06
03 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's concern and am wondering why there is an appendix that describes the differences between this document and 6327 but …
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's concern and am wondering why there is an appendix that describes the differences between this document and 6327 but not a section that describes what is being updated from 6325.  Such a section would clearly identify what an implementer of 6325 would have to look at when supporting this draft and provide a level of assurance that any conflicts between the two documents were created consciously.
2014-01-06
03 Brian Haberman Ballot comment text updated for Brian Haberman
2014-01-06
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2014-01-05
03 Donald Eastlake IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2014-01-05
03 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-03.txt
2014-01-05
02 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-01-03
02 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I couldn't find a clear statement of what parts of RFC 6325 are being
updated. Is the intention of the "updates" metadata and …
[Ballot comment]
I couldn't find a clear statement of what parts of RFC 6325 are being
updated. Is the intention of the "updates" metadata and the text that
says:
  In case of conflict between this document and [RFC6325], this
  document prevails.
...just in case this document creates a conflict with 6325?
I would prefer that "updates" was used to reflect a deliberate and
conscious change, and that such a change was called out.
2014-01-03
02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2014-01-02
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2014-01-02
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon Ballot has been issued
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon Created "Approve" ballot
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-01-09
2013-12-23
02 Ted Lemon Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2013-12-23
02 (System) State changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call (ends 2013-12-23)
2013-12-20
02 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-12-20
02 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that, upon approval of this …
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion. IANA requests that the IANA Considerations section of the document remain in place upon publication.

If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible.
2013-12-12
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2013-12-12
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Elwyn Davies
2013-12-12
02 Jean Mahoney Closed request for Last Call review by GENART with state 'Withdrawn'
2013-12-12
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2013-12-12
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2013-12-12
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Zach Shelby
2013-12-12
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Zach Shelby
2013-12-12
02 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Thomas Nadeau
2013-12-12
02 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Thomas Nadeau
2013-12-09
02 Cindy Morgan IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-12-09
02 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <trill@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <trill@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02.txt> (TRILL: Adjacency) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Transparent Interconnection of
Lots of Links WG (trill) to consider the following document:
- 'TRILL: Adjacency'
  <draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-12-23. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  The IETF TRILL (TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
  protocol supports arbitrary link technologies between TRILL switches
  including point-to-point links and multi-access LAN (Local Area
  Network) links that can have multiple TRILL switches and end stations
  attached. TRILL uses IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate
  System) routing. This document specifies the establishment,
  reporting, and termination of IS-IS adjacency between TRILL switches,
  also known as RBridges. It also concerns four other link-local
  aspects of TRILL: Designated RBridge (DRB) selection, MTU (Maximum
  Transmission Unit) testing, pseudonode creation, and BFD (Bi-
  Directional Forwarding Detection) session bootstrapping in connection
  with adjacency. State diagrams are included where appropriate.  This
  document obsoletes RFC 6327 and updates RFC 6325.






The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


2013-12-09
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-12-09
02 Ted Lemon Last call was requested
2013-12-09
02 Ted Lemon Last call announcement was generated
2013-12-09
02 Ted Lemon Ballot approval text was generated
2013-12-09
02 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was generated
2013-12-09
02 Ted Lemon State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake State Change Notice email list changed to trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis@tools.ietf.org
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake Responsible AD changed to Ted Lemon
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake IESG state set to Publication Requested
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2013-10-25
02 Donald Eastlake Changed document writeup
2013-10-21
02 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-02.txt
2013-10-07
01 Donald Eastlake Document shepherd changed to Jon Hudson
2013-08-14
01 Donald Eastlake IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2013-07-28
01 Donald Eastlake IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2013-07-14
01 Donald Eastlake Working Group Last Call actually issued July 17th.
2013-07-14
01 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-01.txt
2013-06-18
00 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rfc6327bis-00.txt